Teams

Cr.Smith18C7.5

2025 Capital Combo 18 & Over · 7.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.69 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-09-23vs La.Ross18CLost 01
L#1 DoublesKimberly Monsees / Kim von Weihe vs Gillian Sellick / Vanese Clough2-6, 4-6
2025-09-16vs Ra.Mills18CWon 10
W#3 DoublesKimberly Monsees / Anna Kouba vs Taylor Anthony / Jessica Swaney7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2025-09-02vs Je.Fogleman18CLost 01
L#1 DoublesAnna Kouba / Kim von Weihe vs Deanna Drescher / Kathryn Gerber6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2025-08-26vs Da.Driscoll18CWon 10
W#3 DoublesKimberly Monsees / Carole Anne Hussey vs Monica Collins / Jennifer Kazmierczak0-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-08-19vs An.Kinlaw18CLost 01
L#1 DoublesAlex van Staveren / Kimberly Monsees vs Molly Briggs / Emily Uhland2-6, 0-6
2025-08-12vs Ma.Biringer18CSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAlex van Staveren / Kimberly Monsees vs Julie Cronin / Carly Kouskolekas1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesKim von Weihe / Brooke Abee vs Kellie Chesson / Christy Team4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-08-05Lost 01
L#3 DoublesCrystal Smith / Kimberly Monsees vs Laura Ross / Anna Jones3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Mollie Hodl
published 4
3.71
Kim von Weihe
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.59
Carol Lekan
published 4
3.58
3.57
Mary Penn Lunger
published
3.33
Kimberly Monsees
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.32
Elizabeth Easley
published
3.29
Brooke Abee
published 3.5
3.24
Anna Kouba
published 3.5
3.18
Crystal Smith
published 3.5
3.10
Carole Anne Hussey
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mollie Hodl + Kim von Weihe314 matchesnot enough data
Anna Kouba + Elizabeth Easley224 matchesnot enough data
Crystal Smith + Elizabeth Easley213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Mollie Hodl
75W–49L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Kim von Weihe
83W–60L career · 3 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
4
Carol Lekan
5W–8L career · no lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.59
Isabelle Homes Gesher
6W–9L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.58
Mary Penn Lunger
5W–7L career · no lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.57
3.5
Kimberly Monsees
126W–64L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Elizabeth Easley
9W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Brooke Abee
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Anna Kouba
9W–8L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Crystal Smith
7W–11L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Carole Anne Hussey
3W–12L career · no lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.10

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.