Teams

Tennis Titans/Garteiz

2026 Team Singles 18+ SFV Winter · Spring

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
W#1 SinglesMichael Malig vs Trigg Ferrano6-1, 6-4
W#3 SinglesGil Garteiz vs Sheldon Botler6-3, 6-0
W#1 SinglesTomas Gomez vs Arin Rohrer6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesCarter Stimac vs Sheldon Botler6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 SinglesBenjamin Shane vs John Whitt6-0, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesMichael Clauss vs Benjamin Levine7-5, 6-3
W#2 SinglesCarter Stimac vs Seth Trejo6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesJake Stone vs Mohammad Mehryar5-7, 2-6
L#2 SinglesMichael Malig vs Seth Trejo6-7, 2-6
L#3 SinglesBenjamin Shane vs Mohammad Mehryar3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesMichael Clauss vs Aidan Crowley6-3, 7-6
L#2 SinglesGil Garteiz vs Sheldon Botler6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesBenjamin Shane vs Arin Rohrer7-5, 0-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesMichael Malig vs John Whitt6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 SinglesMichael Clauss vs Arin Rohrer6-0, 6-2
L#3 SinglesJake Stone vs Bryan Kariuki7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesTomas Gomez vs Jonathan Strauss6-7, 5-7
L#2 SinglesGil Garteiz vs Seth Trejo6-0, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 SinglesCarter Stimac vs Benjamin Levine2-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Spring
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LLW SFV Bagels and Breadsticks/Calabasas62131126219
2Tennis Titans/Garteiz5315923184
3Breaking Bad Bombers/Pazirandeh/Burbank1781636248

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Michael Clauss
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.47
Gil Garteiz
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
3.40
Mikhail Zeltser
published 3.5
3.35
Tyler Greene
published
3.17
Michael Malig
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Benjamin Shane
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Carter Stimac
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
Jake Stone
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Tomas Gomez
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michael Clauss
4W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.81
Gil Garteiz
15W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
3.47
3.5
Mikhail Zeltser
107W–80L career · no lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.40
Tyler Greene
6W–4L career · no lines in 2026
1%85%14%
3.35
Michael Malig
5W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.17
Benjamin Shane
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Carter Stimac
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jake Stone
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Tomas Gomez
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.