Teams

Escambia/Tan

2025 Escambia Combo 18 & Over · 7.5 Combo 18 & Over - Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.86 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-12-10vs Gonterman - SHLWon 10
W#3 DoublesDodi Stringfellow / Cherie Krohn vs Melanie DiLoreto / Bonita Witkin6-0, 5-7, 1-0
2025-12-03vs Anderson - RS ClaySplit 11
W#2 DoublesKIMBERLY ANDREWS / Tonya Pfeifle vs Amanda Brown / Thuy Nguyen7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesDodi Stringfellow / Ive Marsach vs Elizabeth Elliott / Denise Wilson2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-11-12vs Anderson - RS ClaySplit 11
L#2 DoublesDodi Stringfellow / Cherie Krohn vs Elizabeth Elliott / Amelia Gandy4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCherie Tan / KIMBERLY ANDREWS vs Megan Zimmerman / Erin Rhone7-5, 6-1
2025-11-05vs Gonterman - SHLWon 10
W#2 DoublesCherie Tan / Shannon Schluter vs Caroline Kane / Heather Doerr6-0, 6-2
2025-11-01vs McElhany - PCCWon 10
W#2 DoublesIve Marsach / Dodi Stringfellow vs Edie Wetherell / Valerie Wilson6-3, 6-3
2025-10-15vs Bryan - RS ClayWon 20
W#1 DoublesKIMBERLY ANDREWS / Tonya Pfeifle vs Jeannette Fabbro / Tracey Mcclurd6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesCherie Tan / Shannon Schluter vs Marina Agadzi / Mary Bryan6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Combo 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.31
Abigail Nelson
published 4.5
3.90
Shannon Schluter
published
3.89
Ive Marsach
published 4
3.81
Tonya Pfeifle
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
Cherie Krohn
published 4
3.64
KIMBERLY ANDREWS
published
3.63
Lisa Andresen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.51
Brooklyn Meadows
published 3.5
3.43
Cherie Tan
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.23
Dodi Stringfellow
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published 3.5
Maria Hicks
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dodi Stringfellow + Tonya Pfeifle6354% games+10.7% vs expected
Cherie Tan + Dodi Stringfellow361560% games−3.0% vs expected
Cherie Tan + Tonya Pfeifle404 matchesnot enough data
KIMBERLY ANDREWS + Ive Marsach123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Abigail Nelson
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%8%
4.31
Shannon Schluter
5W–0L career · no lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.90
4
Ive Marsach
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.89
4
Tonya Pfeifle
154W–65L career · 8 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Cherie Krohn
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
KIMBERLY ANDREWS
4W–7L career · no lines in 2025
14%86%<1%
3.64
Lisa Andresen
7W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
15%84%<1%
3.63
3.5
Brooklyn Meadows
5W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%48%52%
3.51
3.5
Cherie Tan
146W–59L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Dodi Stringfellow
120W–64L career · 9 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
Maria Hicks
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.