Teams

LA - Volley Girls

2024 SoCal Doubles - LA · LA - Women 3.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-11-02vs LA - Downtown Aces 3.0Won 20
W#1 DoublesAndrea Shintani / Delta Wright vs Christina Buckley / Lauri Brenner1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCaroline Liao / Jennifer Haber vs Johanna Baumann / Margie Englis6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-10-27vs LA - Get a GripWon 10
W#2 DoublesAndrea Shintani / Sonja Farmer vs Bobbe Gilbert / Susanna Lovell6-2, 6-1
L#1 DoublesJennifer Haber / Bethany Dubick vs Amanda Kain / Elizabeth Heitner3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAndrea Shintani / Antoinette DeVargas vs Uyen Chu / Ana Franco1-6, 2-6
2024-10-19vs LA - Tightly StrungWon 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer Haber / Juli Dershewitz vs Beryl Mendelson / Michele Moshay6-3, 6-3
2024-10-05vs LA - Dare DoublesLost 02
L#1 DoublesJennifer Haber / Delta Wright vs Annie Dang / Kara Smith2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBethany Dubick / Andrea Shintani vs Anne Tate / Elena Howell1-6, 4-6
2024-09-28vs LA - Eastside SwingersWon 20
W#1 DoublesAndrea Shintani / Delta Wright vs Natasha Kirk / Josephine Martorana6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJennifer Haber / Sonja Farmer vs Claire Torok / Caroll-Ann Nguyen2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2024-09-21vs LA - Queen Anne 3.0WWon 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer Haber / Delta Wright vs Andrea Dunlop / Caitlin Neuville6-4, 5-3
2024-09-14vs LA - JBeesWon 10
W#3 DoublesAllison Barber / Andrea Shintani vs Aisha Conner-Gaten / Alexandra Carrethers6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.17
Bethany Dubick
published 3
2.86
Jennifer Haber
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.81
Andrea Shintani
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.81
Caroline Liao
published 3
2.79
Juli Dershewitz
published 3
2.73
Allison Barber
published 3
2.67
Delta Wright
published 3
Natasha Williams
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Juli Dershewitz + Jennifer Haber5650% games−1.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Bethany Dubick
6W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%11%89%
3.17
3
Jennifer Haber
74W–64L career · 6 lines in 2024
1%84%15%
2.86
3
Andrea Shintani
50W–69L career · 6 lines in 2024
1%90%8%
2.81
3
Caroline Liao
6W–7L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%8%
2.81
3
Juli Dershewitz
62W–67L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Allison Barber
6W–6L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Delta Wright
8W–10L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
2.67
Natasha Williams
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.