Teams

SHamer (Olde Providence)

2026 Singles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Singles 4.0 Men - Wed PM

6 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-07-29vs MBoyce (CSRC)Split 11
W#1 SinglesScott Hamer vs Trey Walters6-1, 6-4
L#2 SinglesHenry Ko vs Robert Wallace2-6, 2-6
2026-07-22vs RGum (Lifetime)Won 20
W#1 SinglesBrian Jennaro vs Chris Trunck6-0, 6-4
W#3 SinglesScott Hamer vs Brett Bogle6-2, 6-4
2026-07-15vs TCastain (WSRC)Won 30
W#1 SinglesBrian Jennaro vs Premkumar Jagannathan6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesMarc Soloway vs Simas Petrikis6-1, 6-2
W#3 SinglesScott Hamer vs Paul Sperry6-3, 6-1
2026-07-08vs RShore (Blakeney)Won 20
W#1 SinglesBrian Jennaro vs Jed Levitas6-0, 6-0
W#3 SinglesScott Hamer vs Robert Shore7-5, 6-3
2026-07-07vs MJarzynski (Queens)Won 20
W#1 SinglesBrian Jennaro vs Alec Johnson6-1, 6-0
W#3 SinglesWade Farrow vs Christopher Chandler6-0, 6-3
2026-06-24vs MBoyce (CSRC)Won 20
W#1 SinglesBrian Jennaro vs Chris Elkins6-0, 6-1
W#3 SinglesScott Hamer vs Allan Reich6-1, 6-3
2026-06-17vs RGum (Lifetime)Won 21
W#1 SinglesBrian Jennaro vs Roger Gum6-3, 6-2
L#2 SinglesScott Hamer vs Christopher Northrop3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 SinglesScott Gerbereux vs Jihun Moon6-3, 6-2
2026-06-10vs TCastain (WSRC)Won 30
W#1 SinglesBrian Jennaro vs Paul Sperry6-1, 6-1
W#2 SinglesScott Hamer vs Premkumar Jagannathan6-3, 6-3
W#3 SinglesHenry Ko vs Tom Castain6-1, 6-4
2026-06-03vs RShore (Blakeney)Won 20
W#1 SinglesBrian Jennaro vs Aleksandr Lvovich6-1, 6-1
W#2 SinglesWade Farrow vs NARAYANA REDDY Nalamalpu7-6, 6-3
2026-05-27vs MJarzynski (Queens)Won 20
W#1 SinglesBrian Jennaro vs Michal Jarzynski6-4, 6-0
W#3 SinglesScott Hamer vs Bashaar El Fasid6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Singles 4.0 Men - Wed PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.91 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.20
Brian Jennaro
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
4.11
Scott Gerbereux
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 4
3.90
Wade Farrow
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 4
3.81
Scott Hamer
usually #3 Singles 63%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4
3.81
Henry Ko
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4
3.65
Marc Soloway
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Scott Gerbereux + Brian Jennaro314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brian Jennaro
51W–5L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%6%94%
4.20
4
Scott Gerbereux
29W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%19%81%
4.11
4
Wade Farrow
23W–26L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.90
4
Scott Hamer
61W–11L career · 8 lines in 2026
1%92%8%
3.81
4
Henry Ko
7W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Marc Soloway
55W–35L career · 1 line in 2026
13%87%<1%
3.65

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.