Teams

SFV LLW - Paseo Avengers - September Ryken

2022 SCTA Team Singles 18+ SFV · SFV - Women 3.5 Singles

9 players · average NTRP 3.57 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-11-19Won 10
W#3 SinglesTANIA JANICEK vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-11-06Won 20
W#1 SinglesKio Novina vs Svetlana Sibley6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesSeptember Ryken vs Leslie Lissaint6-2, 6-2
2022-10-30Won 10
W#3 SinglesPeggy Perazzo vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-10-22vs SFV - Warner Grand SlammersLost 02
L#2 SinglesKio Novina vs Olga Marina0-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesMISSY LOPEZ vs Michelle Halpern5-7, 4-6
2022-10-09Lost 01
L#3 SinglesTANIA JANICEK vs Svetlana Sibley4-6, 2-6
2022-10-02Won 10
W#1 SinglesKio Novina vs Yvette Camacho7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2022-09-17vs SFV - Warner Grand SlammersWon 10
W#3 SinglesMISSY LOPEZ vs Christine Whigham6-2, 7-5
2022-09-10vs SFV - Nikki's Tennis CrewWon 20
W#1 SinglesSeptember Ryken vs WHITNEY Bliss6-2, 6-4
W#3 SinglesKio Novina vs Leslie Lissaint6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV - Women 3.5 Singles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Kathryn Speer
published
3.58
Cecilia Greenway
published 4
3.55
Tricia Kim
published
3.38
Peggy Perazzo
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.35
Kio Novina
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.29
MISSY LOPEZ
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
TANIA JANICEK
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
Jacque Clendennen
published 3.5
2.86
September Ryken
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

MISSY LOPEZ + Peggy Perazzo101150% games−2.3% vs expected
September Ryken + MISSY LOPEZ2647% gamesnot enough data
Peggy Perazzo + Tricia Kim6064% gamesnot enough data
September Ryken + Peggy Perazzo0526% gamesnot enough data
MISSY LOPEZ + Kio Novina213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kathryn Speer
5W–6L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Cecilia Greenway
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.58
Tricia Kim
9W–8L career · no lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
3.55
3.5
Peggy Perazzo
125W–139L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Kio Novina
164W–117L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
MISSY LOPEZ
80W–67L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.29
3.5
TANIA JANICEK
102W–89L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Jacque Clendennen
2W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
September Ryken
81W–221L career · 2 lines in 2022
86%14%<1%
2.86

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.