Teams

Bill Sze - 4.0 (Tennis Central)

2022 Flex Singles League - Men (3 · 15)

1 player · average NTRP / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
L#1 SinglesWilliam Sze vs Hong Guo1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesWilliam Sze vs Raymond Li4-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesWilliam Sze vs Hong Guo2-6, 2-6
2022-05-08Lost 01
L#1 SinglesWilliam Sze vs Paul Tarsa3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · 15)
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1James Millward - 4.0 (Milford Indoor Tennis Club)0211217
2Charles Woodward - 4.0 (Guilford Racquet & Swim Cl0330121
3Paul Tarsa - 4.0 (Milford Indoor Tennis Club)0431229
4Bill Sze - 4.0 (Tennis Central)0404848
5Raymond Li - 4.0 (Trumbull Racquet Club)0523647
6Hong Guo - 4.0 (Guilford Racquet & Swim Club)0633646

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

William Sze
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

William Sze
1W–11L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.