Teams

Lazo-Campagna (Alper JCC)

2021 Miami-Dade Adult 18 & Over - Fall Night · 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.44 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2020-11-19vs Gayle (Shulas)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesELIANA BIGAI / Isabel Montejo vs Ivet Hernandez / Andrea Gil0-6, 3-6
2020-11-16vs Burke (Royal Palm)Split 11
L#1 SinglesYASMIN PINTO vs Shelia Barreto4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesAimee Trujillo / Barbara Garcia vs Astrid Artho / ISABEL RICO PASTOR6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2020-11-02vs Gary (Continental Park)Won 10
W#2 DoublesELIANA BIGAI / Isabel Montejo vs Lynne Schettino-DeFelice / Sasha Boca6-3, 7-6
2020-10-28vs Cancian (Tamiami Tennis)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesELIANA BIGAI / Isabel Montejo vs Maristela Britto / Ninoska Castrodad0-6, 0-6
2020-10-12vs McCann (Coral Reef)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesBarbara Garcia / Aimee Trujillo vs Eunice McCann / Alva San Sebastian4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesAlejandra Dinardi / YASMIN PINTO vs Angelica Abud / Maria Perez2-6, 5-7
2020-10-05Lost 01
L#1 SinglesELIANA BIGAI vs Andrea Leon0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
ELIANA BIGAI
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.24
Aimee Trujillo
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.21
Barbara Garcia
published 3.5
3.09
Iliana Klopfenstein
published 3.5
3.07
YASMIN PINTO
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.07
Adriana Rodriguez
published 3.5
3.06
Jeannie Serrano
published
3.06
Ana Victoria Pierce
published 3.5
2.46
Isabel Montejo
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Barbara Garcia + Aimee Trujillo3545% games−3.1% vs expected
Adriana Rodriguez + Jeannie Serrano3837% games−7.8% vs expected
Aimee Trujillo + ELIANA BIGAI4255% gamesnot enough data
Iliana Klopfenstein + Barbara Garcia044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
ELIANA BIGAI
138W–129L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%34%66%
3.55
3.5
Aimee Trujillo
37W–68L career · 2 lines in 2021
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Barbara Garcia
5W–15L career · no lines in 2021
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Iliana Klopfenstein
1W–15L career · no lines in 2021
24%76%<1%
3.09
3.5
YASMIN PINTO
53W–71L career · 2 lines in 2021
29%71%<1%
3.07
3.5
Adriana Rodriguez
8W–27L career · no lines in 2021
29%71%<1%
3.07
Jeannie Serrano
6W–14L career · no lines in 2021
32%68%<1%
3.06
3.5
Ana Victoria Pierce
0W–9L career · no lines in 2021
33%67%<1%
3.06
3
Isabel Montejo
0W–7L career · no lines in 2021
62%38%<1%
2.46

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.