Teams

Smith

2026 CVTA Southern Combo 18 & Over - Summer · Men 7.5

7 players · average NTRP / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-07-15vs DawsonLost 02
L#1 DoublesMatthew Smith / Jonathan Daniell vs Luke Kottemann / Severo Avila3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMichael Bergin / Jim Harrington vs Jackson Norris / Barry Owen1-6, 0-6
2026-07-01vs DawsonSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMatthew Smith / Jonathan Daniell vs Dave Dawson / Clayton McCarter6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMichael Bergin / Ronald Bell vs Barry Owen / Jackson Norris4-6, 5-7
2026-06-25vs DawsonLost 12
W#1 DoublesMatthew Smith / Jonathan Daniell vs Dave Dawson / Clayton McCarter6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJonathan Mize / Ronald Bell vs Luke Kottemann / Jacob Bush4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDwayne McGhee / Shazman Ali vs Timothy Malone / Jackson Norris5-7
2026-06-17vs DawsonLost 02
L#1 DoublesMatthew Smith / Jim Harrington vs Severo Avila / Hayden Childre0-1
L#2 DoublesDwayne McGhee / Jonathan Mize vs Jackson Norris / Clayton McCarter6-7, 5-7
2026-06-10vs DawsonLost 03
L#1 DoublesMatthew Smith / Jim Harrington vs Jacob Bush / Luke Kottemann4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesShazman Ali / Ronald Bell vs Blaine Greeson / Hayden Childre1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMichael Bergin / Dwayne McGhee vs Dave Dawson / Raymond Chang5-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · Men 7.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Smith0521326167

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Jonathan Mize
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Shazman Ali
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.48
Michael Bergin
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.13
Ronald Bell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Jim Harrington
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.07
Dwayne McGhee
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Jonathan Daniell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jonathan Mize
6W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.68
Shazman Ali
20W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
49%51%<1%
3.50
Michael Bergin
1W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
57%43%<1%
3.48
Ronald Bell
9W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.13
Jim Harrington
6W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
28%72%<1%
3.08
Dwayne McGhee
11W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
3.07
Jonathan Daniell
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.