Teams

CACM BLUE

2022 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · MEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-06-03vs CP BRONZEWon 10
W#1 SinglesSteven Naviaux vs Zeb Carabello6-4, 6-3
2022-05-24vs SKY REDWon 10
W#1 SinglesSteven Naviaux vs Livingston Keithley6-1, 6-0
2022-05-17vs CM NAVYWon 20
W#1 DoublesNick Schroer / Steven Naviaux vs Mark Melberg / Buck Flannigan6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesTimothy Pillow / Daniel Sloane vs Zachary Weissman / Brewster Boyd7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2022-05-10vs DTC BLUESplit 11
W#1 DoublesBoyd May / Steven Naviaux vs Howard Sankel / Jason Sindler6-1, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesChristopher Jones / Daniel Sloane vs Joe Tartell / Michael Smith3-6, 2-6
2022-05-03vs WP REDWon 10
W#1 DoublesNick Schroer / Steven Naviaux vs Zuben Bastani / Henry Horne6-1, 6-4
2022-04-26vs EM REDLost 01
L#3 DoublesDaniel Sloane / Michael Peters vs David Steimel / Ryan Smith4-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Nick Schroer
published
3.38
ARTHUR VAUGHN
published 3.5
3.30
Steven Naviaux
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.29
Jonathan Blackburn
published
Boyd May
published 3.5
3.23
Daniel Sloane
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.96
Blake Palmer
published 3.5
Richard Lynn
published
Terrence Davis
published
Timothy Pillow
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

ARTHUR VAUGHN + Boyd May9462% games+9.4% vs expected
Timothy Pillow + Daniel Sloane134 matchesnot enough data
Steven Naviaux + Boyd May213 matchesnot enough data
ARTHUR VAUGHN + Blake Palmer123 matchesnot enough data
Nick Schroer + Boyd May123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nick Schroer
55W–22L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.72
3.5
ARTHUR VAUGHN
66W–43L career · no lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Steven Naviaux
78W–43L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
Jonathan Blackburn
24W–13L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.29
3.5
Boyd May
20W–15L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Daniel Sloane
41W–56L career · 3 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Blake Palmer
19W–40L career · no lines in 2022
61%39%<1%
2.96
Richard Lynn
18W–21L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Terrence Davis
23W–33L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Timothy Pillow
4W–16L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.