Teams

RMTC BLUE

2024 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · MEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT

6 players · average NTRP 2.83 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-09-08vs BRMST GOLDLost 01
L#1 SinglesKeith Cecere vs Mark Korth2-6, 0-6
2024-08-26vs BTA-IBM GREENWon 10
W#2 DoublesKeith Cecere / Eric Sherman vs John Hoeffler / Rich Gribbon7-5, 5-7, 1-0
2024-08-19vs BRMST ORANGELost 01
L#2 DoublesEric Sherman / Matthew Suskin vs Jacob Wilson / Doug Prom3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-08-11vs NJ GREYSplit 11
W#1 SinglesKeith Cecere vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesEric Sherman / Kyle Grage vs Damon Drew / Todd Hurt0-6, 3-6
2024-07-29vs BRMST GOLDLost 01
L#1 DoublesKeith Cecere / Eric Sherman vs Howard Diamond / Chris Guidera2-6, 4-6
2024-07-22vs BTA-IBM GREENLost 02
L#1 DoublesKyle Grage / Keith Cecere vs Rich Gribbon / John Hoeffler1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesEric Sherman vs Ryan Hanneman7-6, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.58 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.85
Keith Cecere
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3
2.68
Thomas Berger
published
2.65
Eric Sherman
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
2.64
Kyle Grage
published
2.09
Ben Brightwell
published 2.5
Matthew Suskin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Eric Sherman + Keith Cecere2644% games−3.5% vs expected
Kyle Grage + Thomas Berger2345% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Keith Cecere
27W–28L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%85%14%
2.85
Thomas Berger
16W–14L career · no lines in 2024
9%89%1%
2.68
3
Eric Sherman
18W–24L career · type A · 5 lines in 2024
14%85%1%
2.65
Kyle Grage
16W–21L career · no lines in 2024
16%84%1%
2.64
2.5
Ben Brightwell
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.09
Matthew Suskin
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.