Teams

MVH Brower FWL A55-8.0M

2025 WMI FWL USTA League Adult 55&Over Weekend Leagues · WMI FWL A55&O 8.0 M (6 player)

11 players · average NTRP 3.75 / WESTERN MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-01-17vs MVR Peceny FWL A55-8.0MSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDavid Borski / Jeffrey Harlow vs Mitch Gathercole / Paul Brown7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesChuck Brower / Jeff Disher vs Jim DeLaFuente / David Lubin6-3, 0-6, 0-1
2025-01-10vs PTC Ponstine FWL A55-8.0MWon 10
W#1 DoublesRodger Price / Jeffrey Harlow vs Donald Klinge / Tom Chandler6-0, 6-2
2025-01-03vs MVH Hall FWL A55-8.0MLost 02
L#1 DoublesRobert Cohen / Rodger Price vs Jeffrey Hall / Albert O'Bryant2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDavid Richmond / Michael Floch vs Jeff Schneider / Edo Mestrom3-6, 0-6
2024-12-20vs PTC Ponstine FWL A55-8.0MLost 12
W#1 DoublesRodger Price / Jeffrey Harlow vs Eric Dreisbach / Christopher Stevens1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRobert Cohen / Chuck Brower vs Earle Irwin / Joseph Kohley3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesMichael Floch / Jeff Disher vs Robert Corl / Thomas Price4-6, 3-6
2024-12-13vs MVR Peceny FWL A55-8.0MSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDavid Degroot / Jeffrey Harlow vs Chris Peceny / Mitch Gathercole6-0, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDavid Richmond / Chuck Brower vs David Lubin / Charles White2-6, 7-5, 1-0
2024-11-22vs MVH Hall FWL A55-8.0MLost 03
L#1 DoublesDavid Borski / Jeffrey Harlow vs Tom Olson / Paul Sedlacek4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesRodger Price / Randy Holkeboer vs Bruce Fedewa / Jeff Schneider5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMichael Floch / Brian Stephens vs John Hendricks / Jon Kroeze2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2024-11-08vs PTC Ponstine FWL A55-8.0MWon 21
W#1 DoublesDavid Borski / Jeffrey Harlow vs Joseph Kohley / James Jantz6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesBrian Stephens / David Degroot vs Robert Corl / Scott Bont6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesMichael Floch / Jeff Disher vs Joe Phanrisvong / Thomas Price2-6, 1-6
2024-10-25vs MVR Peceny FWL A55-8.0MLost 12
W#1 DoublesJeffrey Harlow / Rodger Price vs Paul Brown / Jim DeLaFuente6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesDavid Borski / Jeff Disher vs Mitch Gathercole / Patrick McCabe4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesChuck Brower / Randy Holkeboer vs Steven Deroos / David Lubin6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2024-10-18vs MVH Hall FWL A55-8.0MLost 03
L#1 DoublesRodger Price / Brian Stephens vs Tom Olson / Paul Sedlacek1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Floch / David Richmond vs Bruce Fedewa / Michael Fowler2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesRobert Cohen / Dann Howitt vs Jeffrey Hall / Jeff Schneider3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · WMI FWL A55&O 8.0 M (6 player)
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MVH Hall FWL A55-8.0M8121619200
2MVR Peceny FWL A55-8.0M54141332259
3MVH Brower FWL A55-8.0M3691838251
4PTC Ponstine FWL A55-8.0M27101738265

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
David Borski
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
Brian Stephens
published 4
David Degroot
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
Dann Howitt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
David Richmond
published 3.5
3.18
Chuck Brower
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Jeff Disher
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Jeffrey Harlow
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Michael Floch
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Randy Holkeboer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Rodger Price
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rodger Price + Jeffrey Harlow314 matchesnot enough data
David Borski + Jeffrey Harlow224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
David Borski
6W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Brian Stephens
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
David Degroot
2W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Dann Howitt
4W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3.5
David Richmond
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Chuck Brower
7W–19L career · 4 lines in 2025
9%91%1%
3.18
Jeff Disher
4W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jeffrey Harlow
11W–11L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
Michael Floch
1W–8L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Randy Holkeboer
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rodger Price
11W–6L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.