Teams

Braelinn Turner/Groft

2024 SCTA Fall '23 - Southern Tri-Level 18 and over · 3.0-3.5-.40

16 players · average NTRP 3.67 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.0-3.5-.40 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.41
Stacie Gemmer
published
3.88
Marcie Stoniecki
published
3.83
Chanda Kearns
published 4
3.75
Angie Cox
published 4
3.68
Sara Greene
published
3.60
Michelle Koelsch
published
3.58
Leslie Spitznagle
published
3.52
Briana Berggren
published 3.5
3.51
Karen Zeng
published
3.43
3.22
Kerri Edwards
published
3.21
Dina Slater
published
3.18
Amanda Page
published 3.5
3.16
Amy Groft
published 3.5
Jenny Tortola
published
Kathy Turner
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leslie Spitznagle + Chanda Kearns6451% games+0.1% vs expected
Michelle Koelsch + Daniela Hofman-Diliberto2350% gamesnot enough data
Amy Groft + Daniela Hofman-Diliberto4155% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stacie Gemmer
4W–0L career · no lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
4.41
Marcie Stoniecki
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
3.88
4
Chanda Kearns
9W–8L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Angie Cox
14W–9L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.75
Sara Greene
7W–2L career · no lines in 2024
9%89%1%
3.68
Michelle Koelsch
22W–15L career · no lines in 2024
<1%24%76%
3.60
Leslie Spitznagle
10W–18L career · no lines in 2024
28%71%<1%
3.58
3.5
Briana Berggren
9W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%45%55%
3.52
Karen Zeng
23W–26L career · no lines in 2024
<1%47%53%
3.51
3.5
Daniela Hofman-Diliberto
27W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
3.43
Kerri Edwards
42W–26L career · no lines in 2024
<1%6%94%
3.22
Dina Slater
10W–14L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Amanda Page
5W–1L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Amy Groft
17W–15L career · no lines in 2024
13%86%1%
3.16
Jenny Tortola
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kathy Turner
6W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.