Teams

DTC YELLOW

2022 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 7.0 - 55 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.36 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2022-06-29vs GTC BLUELost 02
L#2 DoublesJody Hunnicutt / Jann Peterson vs Tamara Bianchi / Sue Hickey7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKathy Graveley / Rebecca Wulliman vs Sanda McMillan / Kimberly Allen3-6, 3-6
2022-06-22vs CACM GREENSplit 11
L#1 DoublesRebecca Wulliman / Kathy Graveley vs Lesleigh Anderson / Samantha Hanson7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJann Peterson / Linda Feiman vs Lise Uhrich / Lisa Maragon6-4, 6-2
2022-06-15vs LTC REDSplit 11
L#2 DoublesJody Hunnicutt / Wendy Glazer vs Vera Aaron / Martha McNamara7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJann Peterson / Linda Feiman vs Ellen Muller / Karla Henkart6-2, 6-0
2022-06-08vs CACM BLUELost 02
L#1 DoublesJody Hunnicutt / Wendy Glazer vs Mary Beth Church / Bev Morrow3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLinda Feiman / Deborah Yoder vs Karla Simons / Barbara Hall2-6, 3-6
2022-06-06vs GTC REDLost 12
L#1 DoublesKaren Polzin / Deborah Yoder vs Claudia Pillow / Tammy Chamberlain5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJann Peterson / Susan Nakano vs Deborah Alper / JoEllen Legg0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesKathy Graveley / Rebecca Wulliman vs Anne Angerman / Susan High6-3, 6-3
2022-05-25vs GTC BLUELost 02
L#1 DoublesWendy Glazer / Deborah Yoder vs Lisa Winston / Suzette Emerson1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Polzin / Jody Hunnicutt vs Sue Hickey / Tamara Bianchi2-6, 2-6
2022-05-18vs CACM GREENWon 21
W#1 DoublesWendy Glazer / Deborah Yoder vs Lisa Maragon / Lise Uhrich6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJann Peterson / Elizabeth Kelly vs Carol Bedin / Becky Reimers6-4, 0-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKathy Graveley / Rebecca Wulliman vs Lisa Snider / Samantha Hanson6-1, 6-3
2022-05-11vs LTC REDLost 12
L#1 DoublesJeannie Crawford / Wendy Glazer vs Nancy Driver / Margo Constable4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLinda Feiman / Kathy Graveley vs April Kobayashi / Martha McNamara2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJann Peterson / Susan Nakano vs Barbara Woodward / Vera Aaron6-1, 6-3
2022-05-10vs CACM BLUEWon 30
W#1 DoublesJody Hunnicutt / Karen Polzin vs Karla Simons / Helen Wilson6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJeannie Crawford / Wendy Glazer vs Melanie Darden / Barbara Hall6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSusan Nakano / Linda Feiman vs Bev Morrow / Kathy Bailey7-5, 6-3
2022-04-27vs GTC REDSplit 11
W#2 DoublesDeborah Yoder / Linda Feiman vs Mary Lou Clark / Anne Angerman6-3, 6-0
L#3 DoublesJody Hunnicutt / Susan Nakano vs Deborah Alper / Tammy Chamberlain3-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 7.0 - 55 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Jody Hunnicutt
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 39% · published 3.5
3.23
Rebecca Wulliman
published
3.21
Wendy Glazer
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
3.11
Jann Peterson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.08
Linda Feiman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.00
Susan Nakano
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.89
Deborah Yoder
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
Kathy Graveley
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
Jeannie Crawford
published
Karen Polzin
published
Kathleen Andrews
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Linda Feiman + Jody Hunnicutt10358% games+7.1% vs expected
Jeannie Crawford + Kathleen Andrews13264% games+6.3% vs expected
Linda Feiman + Susan Nakano19758% games+5.0% vs expected
Jody Hunnicutt + Karen Polzin12556% games+1.3% vs expected
Jody Hunnicutt + Jann Peterson171058% games+1.2% vs expected
Susan Nakano + Jann Peterson5356% games+0.9% vs expected
Susan Nakano + Deborah Yoder3250% games+0.4% vs expected
Susan Nakano + Jody Hunnicutt3447% games−4.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jody Hunnicutt
109W–80L career · 13 lines in 2022
<1%84%15%
3.37
Rebecca Wulliman
34W–41L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Wendy Glazer
79W–93L career · 10 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
Jann Peterson
51W–47L career · 6 lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.11
3.5
Linda Feiman
55W–28L career · 6 lines in 2022
28%72%<1%
3.08
3.5
Susan Nakano
57W–68L career · 4 lines in 2022
48%52%<1%
3.00
3
Deborah Yoder
37W–58L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
2.89
3
Kathy Graveley
38W–32L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Jeannie Crawford
21W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Karen Polzin
33W–19L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kathleen Andrews
39W–17L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.