Teams

CCC HOLT

2025 FW Adult 18 & Over League - Ladies · Friday Ladies 3.0

14 players · average NTRP 2.90 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-04-26vs RC WITTEN/KOSTOHRYZLost 02
L#1 DoublesSuzanne Burroughs / Jennifer Bekish vs Elizabeth Brookshire / Hannah Witten3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesErin Greer / Karen Reid vs Elizabeth Deegan / McKenzie DePriest3-6, 4-6
2025-03-25vs CCC GRENNAN/ROSENSTEINWon 21
W#1 DoublesMolly Keathley / Karen Reid vs Pamela Gilchrist / Lyndsay Valickus3-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAlison Turner vs Anna Pastusek7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJaci Smith / Pam Packer vs Jennifer Grennan / Jean Hutnyak6-4, 6-3
2025-03-07vs OAK POLLYLost 01
L#2 DoublesAshley Berzon / Courtney Holt vs Lisa Waters / Taylor Robertson7-6, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Friday Ladies 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.62 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.79
Molly Keathley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.77
Ashley Berzon
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Alison Turner
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.74
Erin Greer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.68
Natalie Henrikson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 38% · published
2.68
Jennifer Bekish
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.64
Suzanne Burroughs
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.58
Amanda Easley
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
2.53
Karen Reid
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.46
Adrienne Makens
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.36
Courtney Holt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Jaci Smith
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Mia Rainey
published
Pam Packer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Bekish + Erin Greer2535% games−7.0% vs expected
Jennifer Bekish + Suzanne Burroughs224 matchesnot enough data
Suzanne Burroughs + Erin Greer314 matchesnot enough data
Amanda Easley + Karen Reid123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Molly Keathley
5W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
2.79
3
Ashley Berzon
7W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Alison Turner
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Erin Greer
6W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%3%
2.74
Natalie Henrikson
8W–19L career · 8 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
Jennifer Bekish
5W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
Suzanne Burroughs
6W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
17%83%<1%
2.64
3
Amanda Easley
7W–13L career · type A · 5 lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
2.58
Karen Reid
3W–17L career · 6 lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
2.53
3
Adrienne Makens
9W–25L career · type A · 8 lines in 2025
61%39%<1%
2.46
2.5
Courtney Holt
2W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
0%85%15%
2.36
Jaci Smith
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Mia Rainey
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Pam Packer
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.