Teams

Stoddard/Piedmont-2 18 3.0W Singles Sunday

2025 Piedmont Singles 18 · 3.0 Women Singles Sun

7 players · average NTRP / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
W#1 SinglesRachel Bryant vs Suki Gutierrez6-3, 6-4
W#2 SinglesNancy Stoddard vs Kylie Roy1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 SinglesMeredith Vaughn vs Whitney Kuebert4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesRachel Bryant vs Katie Breeding1-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesKelly Hargett vs Catherine Johnstone1-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesNakisha Boulware Watts vs Gracie Thompson0-6, 0-6
2025-07-13vs Olalere 18+ 3.0W Singles SundaySplit 11
W#1 SinglesRachel Bryant vs Kelen Walker7-5, 6-2
L#3 SinglesSydney Wittman vs Shelly Tuhro4-6, 5-7
2025-06-22vs Keaney 18 3.0W Singles SundayLost 02
L#1 SinglesNancy Stoddard vs Alexa Smith0-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesSydney Wittman vs Cackie Marsh4-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesNancy Stoddard vs Cozetta Gaines6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 SinglesMeredith Vaughn vs Whitney Kuebert2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesKelly Hargett vs Kathy Falls0-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesMeredith Vaughn vs Tamieka Howell7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 SinglesNakisha Boulware Watts vs Sammie Jo McCluskey0-6, 0-6
2025-06-01vs Olalere 18+ 3.0W Singles SundaySplit 11
L#1 SinglesRachel Bryant vs Kate Augustine5-7, 3-6
W#2 SinglesNancy Stoddard vs Meghan Flynn7-6, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women Singles Sun have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
Michele Matthews
published
3.14
Rachel Bryant
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.90
Nancy Stoddard
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.77
Sydney Wittman
usually #3 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published
2.40
Meredith Vaughn
usually #3 Singles 57%, also #2 Singles 29% · published
Kelly Hargett
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Nakisha Boulware Watts
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michele Matthews
28W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.36
Rachel Bryant
44W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%16%84%
3.14
Nancy Stoddard
23W–20L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
2.90
Sydney Wittman
7W–3L career · 5 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
Meredith Vaughn
7W–19L career · 7 lines in 2025
0%76%24%
2.40
Kelly Hargett
0W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nakisha Boulware Watts
0W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.