Teams

NAZ/Molina/55&Over/8.0M

2022 Adult 55 & Over- NAZ · NAZ 8.0 Men

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTHERN ARIZONA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-05-22vs KolodyWon 21
W#1 DoublesRichard Hayes / Chris Howard vs John Kolody / Warren Cassatt6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesGeorge Molina / Brian Buchholtz vs Jon Turoczy / Thomas Howell3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSteven Pierce / Richard Neely vs Link Paffenbarger / Bill Beauvais6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2022-05-22vs KolodyLost 12
W#1 DoublesBrian Buchholtz / Bruce Carlton vs Warren Cassatt / Thomas Howell6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDaniel Lenardon / Charles Carey vs Jon Turoczy / Link Paffenbarger3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesRichard Neely / George Molina vs Bill Beauvais / John Kolody3-6, 6-7
2022-05-14vs KolodyLost 12
W#1 DoublesBilly Bilbray / Jeff Champ vs Robert Schuessler / John Kolody6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesSteven Pierce / Richard Neely vs Warren Cassatt / Thomas Howell6-0, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDaniel Lenardon / Brian Buchholtz vs Bill Beauvais / Link Paffenbarger5-7, 1-6
2022-05-14vs KolodyWon 21
L#1 DoublesSteven Pierce / Richard Neely vs Bill Beauvais / Link Paffenbarger7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBilly Bilbray / Jeff Champ vs Warren Cassatt / Robert Schuessler6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesGeorge Molina / Brian Buchholtz vs John Kolody / Thomas Howell6-3, 6-2
2022-05-07vs KolodyLost 12
L#1 DoublesJeff Champ / Brian Buchholtz vs Warren Cassatt / Link Paffenbarger5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRichard Hayes / Chris Howard vs Michael Pilsl / Diego Constante7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesBilly Bilbray / Daniel Lenardon vs John Kolody / Thomas Howell2-6, 3-6
2022-05-07vs KolodyWon 30
W#1 DoublesSteven Pierce / Richard Neely vs Diego Constante / Michael Pilsl7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesGeorge Molina / Brian Buchholtz vs Link Paffenbarger / Warren Cassatt4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBilly Bilbray / Jeff Champ vs John Kolody / Thomas Howell6-2, 7-5
2022-05-01vs KolodyWon 21
W#1 DoublesChris Howard / Richard Hayes vs Thomas Howell / Link Paffenbarger6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesGeorge Molina / Richard Neely vs Robert Schuessler / John Kolody6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesSteven Pierce / Charles Carey vs Diego Constante / Michael Pilsl6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2022-05-01vs KolodyLost 12
W#1 DoublesBruce Carlton / Steven Pierce vs John Kolody / Robert Schuessler6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesGeorge Molina / Richard Neely vs Diego Constante / Michael Pilsl3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCharles Carey / Daniel Lenardon vs Thomas Howell / Link Paffenbarger1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NAZ 8.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Billy Bilbray
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
Bruce Carlton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Chris Howard
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Daniel Lenardon
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
George Molina
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.53
Jeff Champ
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.31
Brian Buchholtz
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
Charles Carey
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Richard Hayes
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Richard Neely
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Steven Pierce
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brian Buchholtz + Jeff Champ9363% gamesnot enough data
Brian Buchholtz + George Molina5354% gamesnot enough data
Richard Neely + George Molina5253% gamesnot enough data
George Molina + Bruce Carlton4252% gamesnot enough data
Chris Howard + Richard Hayes5072% gamesnot enough data
Billy Bilbray + Jeff Champ5067% gamesnot enough data
Richard Neely + Steven Pierce224 matchesnot enough data
Richard Neely + Bruce Carlton404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Billy Bilbray
9W–7L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Bruce Carlton
17W–4L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Chris Howard
7W–6L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Daniel Lenardon
19W–10L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
George Molina
26W–18L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Jeff Champ
33W–25L career · 4 lines in 2022
40%60%<1%
3.53
4
Brian Buchholtz
35W–18L career · 6 lines in 2022
93%7%<1%
3.31
Charles Carey
12W–10L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Richard Hayes
7W–0L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Richard Neely
19W–8L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
Steven Pierce
11W–11L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.