Teams

NITA S 75CWDe Oak Park-Myers/Locke

2024 NITA3 Summerz Combo Daytime · NITA Summer Daytime 7.5 Combo Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTHERN ILLINOIS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-07-29vs NITA S 75CWDb Score-Michl/MoskowitzSplit 11
W#2 DoublesCarrie Cook / Mary Jane Neumann vs Michelle Hejna / Lisa Sher6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesLisa Bierman / Susan Markowitz vs Joni Sherman / Janee Matteson2-6, 4-6
W#1 DoublesKaren Hunter / Carrie Cook vs Neena Will / Wendy MacRi6-1, 6-0
L#1 DoublesSharon Hermanns / Kristin Collins vs Marilyn Tansey / Debbi Landorf7-6, 4-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSusan Markowitz / Natalie Thompson vs Michelle Reynolds / Maureen Henderson3-6, 1-6
2024-06-26vs NITA S 75CWDa St Charles-ShieldsWon 20
W#1 DoublesKristin Collins / Sharon Hermanns vs Jennifer Shields / Jaymie McGrath6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesRobin Funk / Susan Markowitz vs Laura McEnery / Sterling Decker6-1, 6-3
W#1 DoublesKristin Collins / Robin Funk vs Amy Felton / Marika Panton6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKaren Hunter / Danielle Locke vs Julie Hendricks / Helen Lee6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · NITA Summer Daytime 7.5 Combo Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NITA S 75CWDf Five Star-Delgrosso5114413126
2NITA S 75CWDa St Charles-Shields4214411122
3NITA S 75CWDc Rush Copley-Odenbeck/Arnold4210818161
4NITA S 75CWDe Oak Park-Myers/Locke3381022154
5NITA S 75CWDb Score-Michl/Moskowitz2461225167
6NITA S 75CWDd River Forest-Panton/Druckman2461228175
7NITA S 75CWDg Salt Creek-Jones/Olson1551326177

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Katrin Maldre
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Alexis Hiller
published 4
3.68
Deborah Poe
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.64
Kristin Collins
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.61
Robin Funk
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
Carrie Cook
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Danielle Locke
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.19
Sharon Hermanns
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.13
Lisa Bierman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Jenna Wellner
published
Karen Hunter
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Mary Jane Neumann
published
Susan Markowitz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Deborah Poe + Kristin Collins4257% games−1.3% vs expected
Katrin Maldre + Deborah Poe3554% gamesnot enough data
Kristin Collins + Sharon Hermanns2350% gamesnot enough data
Kristin Collins + Robin Funk3249% gamesnot enough data
Sharon Hermanns + Lisa Bierman1445% gamesnot enough data
Karen Hunter + Deborah Poe404 matchesnot enough data
Sharon Hermanns + Robin Funk224 matchesnot enough data
Katrin Maldre + Kristin Collins303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Katrin Maldre
109W–82L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%76%23%
3.90
4
Alexis Hiller
22W–13L career · type A · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Deborah Poe
111W–107L career · 2 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.68
Kristin Collins
32W–35L career · 3 lines in 2024
16%84%1%
3.64
4
Robin Funk
51W–24L career · 3 lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.61
3.5
Carrie Cook
11W–12L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Danielle Locke
18W–11L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Sharon Hermanns
42W–71L career · 4 lines in 2024
8%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Lisa Bierman
8W–32L career · 3 lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
3.13
Jenna Wellner
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Karen Hunter
12W–12L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Mary Jane Neumann
4W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Susan Markowitz
7W–6L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.