Teams

Viera Regional Park - Helton

2023 Brevard Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.58 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-07-18vs Suntree - FordWon 20
W#2 DoublesMichelle Ruether / Michael Bealer vs Darien Lawrence / Seth Glick7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCuc Nguyen / Long Dang vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-07-11vs Suntree - McIntoshLost 02
L#2 DoublesDonna Paternoster / Michael Bealer vs Abigail Smith / Matthew Pierce2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRobert Polvino / Deena Helton vs Sandra Rowe / Kyle McIntosh2-6, 2-6
2023-06-27vs Brevard/Simmons/Mixed18&Over7.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesCuc Nguyen / Long Dang vs Isidro Zavaleta / Cynthia Simmons1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMichelle Ruether / Michael Bealer vs Trey Crowley / Pauline Mitchell0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDonna Paternoster / Anthony Pierluissi vs Phyllis O'Toole / Gregory Whitaker2-6, 1-6
2023-06-20vs Rockledge - DonovanLost 01
L#3 DoublesAnthony Pierluissi / Michelle Ruether vs Jay Amburgey / Tina Amburgey1-6, 1-6
2023-06-13vs Kiwi - JacksonLost 12
L#1 DoublesAnthony Pierluissi / Donna Paternoster vs Chad Shoultz / Tracey Draper3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Bealer / Deena Helton vs Valerie Baldwin / Robert Baldwin2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCuc Nguyen / Long Dang vs Janaina Minamyer / Christopher Minamyer6-0, 6-2
2023-06-05vs Sarno - DwyerSplit 11
L#2 DoublesLong Dang / Cuc Nguyen vs Steven Lindsley / Emily Dwyer3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesMichael Bealer / Michelle Ruether vs Sanjay Gopal / Melissa Dwyer6-1, 6-2
2023-05-30vs Rockledge - FaillaWon 20
W#2 DoublesRobert Polvino / Deena Helton vs Melinda Hartnett / Nathan Hartnett6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMichael Bealer / Donna Paternoster vs Jim Tulloch / Miriam Melendez6-1, 6-1
2023-05-16vs Fee - RouveyrolWon 20
W#2 DoublesRobert Polvino / Deena Helton vs David Baker / Angela Stanley6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesOmar Meguid / Cuc Nguyen vs Stephan Rouveyrol / Ally Heeley6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Dustin Hagy
published 4
3.51
Cuc Nguyen
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.44
Donna Paternoster
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.31
Heather Harris
published 3.5
3.30
Long Dang
published
3.25
Michelle Ruether
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.16
Deena Helton
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Katharine Polvino
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Dustin Hagy
4W–1L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%5%
3.79
3.5
Cuc Nguyen
111W–58L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%48%52%
3.51
3.5
Donna Paternoster
82W–75L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%69%31%
3.44
3.5
Heather Harris
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.31
Long Dang
10W–9L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Michelle Ruether
90W–89L career · 4 lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Deena Helton
152W–88L career · 4 lines in 2023
11%89%<1%
3.16
Katharine Polvino
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.