Teams

IMPERIAL TC 55MX7.0A

2022 MIXED 55&Over · 55&Over MX7.0

16 players · average NTRP 3.39 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 55&Over MX7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

George Taylor
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.25
Carol LeGrande
published 3.5
Arlinda Amador
published 3.5
David Barker
published 3.5
Haydi Danielson
published 3.5
3.08
Art Walker
published 3.5
2.98
Eileen Forster
published 3.5
2.81
Eda Borasi
published 3
2.58
Nancy Franich
published
2.16
Eddie Castro
published 2.5
Jean Bremner
published
Julie Nielsen
published
Kathie Park
published
Kavita Snyder
published
Kevin Barringer
published
Sarah T Alsberg
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
George Taylor
121W–113L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Carol LeGrande
3W–9L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Arlinda Amador
1W–0L career · type S · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
David Barker
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Haydi Danielson
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Art Walker
2W–6L career · no lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
3.08
3.5
Eileen Forster
2W–8L career · no lines in 2022
57%43%<1%
2.98
3
Eda Borasi
4W–6L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
2.81
Nancy Franich
3W–11L career · no lines in 2022
28%72%<1%
2.58
2.5
Eddie Castro
0W–7L career · type S · no lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
2.16
Jean Bremner
3W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Julie Nielsen
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kathie Park
3W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kavita Snyder
5W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kevin Barringer
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sarah T Alsberg
7W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.