Teams

RRC Doubles or Nothing

2024 55&over Mixed · 7.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.25 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-03-17vs TCH: Mixed NutsLost 12
L#1 DoublesKaren Moriarty / Mark DiMassimo vs Richard Getler / Rita Raz2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesWendy Hyer / Brian Keane vs Deborah Antoine / Dan Siegel6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLaura Frase / JJ Lipuma vs Richard Cohen / Jane Prokop1-6, 1-6
2024-03-10vs TCH: Mixed NutsLost 03
L#1 DoublesAndrea Mancini / Takashi Ogashi vs Deborah Antoine / Gil Feder1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Nask / Drew Hanson vs Donna Kalin / Evan Kalin4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDolores Principe Masino / Mark DiMassimo vs Bonnie Rodgers / Philip Murray1-6, 3-6
2024-03-03vs TCH: Mixed NutsLost 12
W#1 DoublesKaren Moriarty / Drew Hanson vs Robin Good / James Pezzuto6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDaniela Sansone / Takashi Ogashi vs Christine Burns / Larry Lippert6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesWendy Hyer / Michael Masino vs Jane Prokop / Richard Cohen6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2024-02-04vs TCH: Mixed NutsLost 03
L#1 DoublesDaniela Sansone / Takashi Ogashi vs Christine Burns / Larry Lippert6-0, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSusan Nask / Drew Hanson vs Yoonho Park / Paula Park0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesAndrea Mancini / Glen Sansone vs Barbara Penge / Gil Feder7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2024-01-28vs TCH: Mixed NutsLost 03
L#1 DoublesKaren Moriarty / Mark DiMassimo vs Philip Murray / Jane Prokop3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJJ Lipuma / Susan Nask vs Barbara Penge / Dan Siegel6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLaura Frase / Michael Masino vs Bonnie Rodgers / Greg Leeds4-6, 4-6
2024-01-21vs TCH: Mixed NutsLost 03
L#1 DoublesMichiyo Terakado / Mark DiMassimo vs Ryan Pence / Elizabeth Holdstein6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAndrea Mancini / Takashi Ogashi vs James Pezzuto / Robin Good6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSusan Nask / JJ Lipuma vs Donna Kalin / Evan Kalin1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1TCH: Mixed Nuts0616211127
2RRC Doubles or Nothing0621633188

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Wendy Hyer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.31
Glen Sansone
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
JJ Lipuma
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.24
Daniela Sansone
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.09
Andrea Mancini
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.08
Karen Moriarty
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.00
Laura Frase
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.85
Susan Nask
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.79
Brian Keane
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
Drew Hanson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.71
Michael Masino
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.27
Dolores Principe Masino
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Mark DiMassimo
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Michiyo Terakado
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Takashi Ogashi
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Glen Sansone + Karen Moriarty6255% games+4.9% vs expected
Glen Sansone + Daniela Sansone121149% games+0.1% vs expected
Dolores Principe Masino + Michael Masino151151% games−6.7% vs expected
Laura Frase + Michael Masino1439% games−8.2% vs expected
Andrea Mancini + Brian Keane2447% games−9.8% vs expected
Andrea Mancini + Michael Masino0636% games−14.3% vs expected
Brian Keane + Karen Moriarty2539% gamesnot enough data
Mark DiMassimo + Karen Moriarty1535% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Wendy Hyer
196W–154L career · 2 lines in 2024
56%44%<1%
3.48
3.5
Glen Sansone
122W–99L career · 1 line in 2024
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
JJ Lipuma
1W–13L career · type M · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Daniela Sansone
150W–116L career · 2 lines in 2024
3%95%2%
3.24
3.5
Andrea Mancini
155W–124L career · type A · 5 lines in 2024
24%75%<1%
3.09
3.5
Karen Moriarty
181W–179L career · 3 lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
3.08
3
Laura Frase
140W–117L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%50%50%
3.00
3
Susan Nask
92W–91L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%88%12%
2.85
3
Brian Keane
54W–47L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%94%5%
2.79
3
Drew Hanson
6W–38L career · type M · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Michael Masino
70W–92L career · 6 lines in 2024
5%93%1%
2.71
2.5
Dolores Principe Masino
146W–140L career · 4 lines in 2024
0%96%4%
2.27
Mark DiMassimo
4W–17L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Michiyo Terakado
46W–37L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Takashi Ogashi
0W–8L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.