Teams

IE-Canyon Lake-Conlin

2026 USTA Adult 40 & Over - IE · IE Women 3.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.28 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-03-01vs IE-TCC-DanielsLost 03
L#1 DoublesTonya Morones / Alicia Taverner vs Jennifer Daniels / Mary Herbers Eme6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSandy Wible / Becky Gagnon vs Tracy DuPrez / Maria Sambito7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDanette Conlin / Carrie Collins vs Anne Neal / Susan Cardona2-6, 2-6
W#1 DoublesDanette Conlin / Becky Gagnon vs Rebekah Cross / Tammy Bensch6-4, 6-2
L#1 SinglesSandy Wible vs Trish Evans2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesRhonda Arendt / Tonya Morones vs Aide Abelsky / Kathleen Leonard6-2, 7-5
2026-02-22vs IE-CCCC-KayLost 04
L#1 DoublesDanette Conlin / Coreen Graff vs Janet Giles / Laura Hibbard1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesAlicia Taverner vs Laura Acosta2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSandy Wible / Erin Furlong vs Jamie Evans / Kelly Bollmann2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesTonya Morones / Carrie Collins vs Theresa Winterburn / Amy Garrett4-6, 4-6
2026-02-08vs IE-Redlands-RydellLost 12
L#1 DoublesSandy Wible / Coreen Graff vs Connie DeLong / Michelle Rai2-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesSungjin Renouf vs Gayle Vanderlinden6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesCarrie Collins / Danette Conlin vs Natalie Nofsinger / GINA SKIBAR4-6, 6-0, 0-1
2026-01-24vs IE-LLW-Andulka-CurtissLost 04
L#1 DoublesErin Furlong / Danette Conlin vs Jane Magro / Roz Vinson2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesAlicia Taverner vs Heidi Brun1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesBecky Gagnon / Sandy Wible vs Saleshnie Sukhram / Jannah Carrasco5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRhonda Arendt / Carrie Collins vs Deborah Laurent / Dorothy Geiger6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2026-01-17vs IE-Vista Murrieta-HarnedWon 40
W#1 DoublesCoreen Graff / Becky Gagnon vs Darla Gonzalez / Tessie Rivera7-6, 6-4
W#1 SinglesSandy Wible vs Laura Myers6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesDanette Conlin / Erin Furlong vs Toni McAllister / Elvira Schlanger6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesRhonda Arendt / Sungjin Renouf vs Susan Tidwell / Jeanie Thacker6-2, 6-2
2026-01-10vs IE-MTC-ShelterWon 40
W#1 DoublesBecky Gagnon / Coreen Graff vs Liz Pledger / Lori Covach6-2, 7-6
W#1 SinglesSungjin Renouf vs Rachel Tzinberg6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesSandy Wible / Erin Furlong vs Rosa Galeas-Vamadeva / Joan Greene6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCarrie Collins / Rhonda Arendt vs Heather Smith / Linda Brown3-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · IE Women 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1IE-LLW-Andulka-Curtiss6119921209
2IE-Canyon Lake-Conlin34121634255

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Sungjin Renouf
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.34
Becky Gagnon
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.31
Erin Furlong
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.22
Coreen Graff
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Sandy Wible
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 3.5
3.13
Tonya Morones
usually #1 Doubles 36%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published
3.09
Rhonda Arendt
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.06
Carrie Collins
usually #1 Doubles 58%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.97
Alicia Taverner
usually #1 Singles 91%, also #1 Doubles 9% · published 3
2.95
Therese Washle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.77
Danette Conlin
usually #1 Doubles 73%, also #2 Doubles 18% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carrie Collins + Tonya Morones8171% games+13.6% vs expected
Danette Conlin + Carrie Collins3454% games+6.3% vs expected
Sungjin Renouf + Becky Gagnon9361% games−3.1% vs expected
Sandy Wible + Becky Gagnon6946% games−15.9% vs expected
Erin Furlong + Sandy Wible3256% gamesnot enough data
Sungjin Renouf + Erin Furlong224 matchesnot enough data
Carrie Collins + Therese Washle404 matchesnot enough data
Sungjin Renouf + Sandy Wible123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Sungjin Renouf
43W–38L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Becky Gagnon
61W–40L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%88%11%
3.34
3.5
Erin Furlong
49W–48L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Coreen Graff
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
3.22
3.5
Sandy Wible
58W–67L career · 7 lines in 2026
5%93%1%
3.21
Tonya Morones
14W–7L career · 11 lines in 2026
<1%16%84%
3.13
Rhonda Arendt
3W–1L career · 4 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.09
3
Carrie Collins
18W–6L career · 12 lines in 2026
<1%32%68%
3.06
3
Alicia Taverner
18W–6L career · 11 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
2.97
3
Therese Washle
30W–35L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
Danette Conlin
8W–9L career · 11 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
2.77

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.