Teams

GB:Williams

2022 NH Adult 65 & Over Women Day · 6.0 Women

5 players · average NTRP / NEW HAMPSHIRE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-06-23vs ALG:GalloLost 12
W#1 DoublesSharon Hughes / Janice Williams vs Louise Bernier / Sandra Townsend6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLee Sullivan / Nan Vigars vs Jayne Morin / Giovanna Timberlake5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKate Miller / Phyllis Mastroianni vs Cyrilla Lombardi / Terri Foden4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2022-06-16vs CON:DahmeWon 30
W#1 DoublesSharon Hughes / Janice Williams vs Cher Barker / Carolyn Dickey6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesKate Miller / Phyllis Mastroianni vs Suzanne Sauer / Anne Burnett7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesNan Vigars / Lee Sullivan vs Patricia Dahme / Nancy Rosen6-1, 6-3
2022-06-02vs ALG:GalloLost 12
W#1 DoublesSharon Hughes / Janice Williams vs Cyrilla Lombardi / Julie Malvone6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPhyllis Mastroianni / Nan Vigars vs Giovanna Timberlake / Kathy Gallo1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesPenny Schmitt / Lee Sullivan vs Terri Foden / Beverly Lannan6-2, 5-7, 0-1
2022-05-26vs CON:DahmeWon 21
W#1 DoublesJanice Williams / Kate Miller vs Cher Barker / Jean Lacroix7-5, 7-6
L#2 DoublesNan Vigars / Phyllis Mastroianni vs Betty Mitchell / Carolyn Dickey3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesLinda Pankoff / Lee Sullivan vs Anne Burnett / Suzanne Sauer3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-05-12vs ALG:GalloLost 02
L#2 DoublesKate Miller / Nan Vigars vs Debra LaPress / Giovanna Timberlake4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesPhyllis Mastroianni / Linda Pankoff vs Terri Foden / Beverly Lannan0-6, 0-6
2022-05-05vs CON:DahmeWon 30
W#1 DoublesSharon Hughes / Janice Williams vs Betty Mitchell / Carolyn Dickey5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNan Vigars / Kate Miller vs Suzanne Sauer / Suzanne Walsh6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLee Sullivan / Linda Pankoff vs Karen Kelly / Nancy Rosen6-1, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 6.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1ALG:Gallo0612615139
2GB:Williams0610821181
3CON:Dahme0651328199

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.40 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.40
Phyllis Mastroianni
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Janice Williams
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Lee Sullivan
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Nan Vigars
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
Sharon Hughes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janice Williams + Sharon Hughes6054% gamesnot enough data
Nan Vigars + Phyllis Mastroianni123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Phyllis Mastroianni
21W–44L career · 5 lines in 2022
77%23%<1%
2.40
Janice Williams
16W–10L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Lee Sullivan
23W–19L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Nan Vigars
9W–15L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sharon Hughes
22W–15L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.