Teams

RCCB - Heyn

2022 Brevard Social World Team Tennis · WWT 3.5 Lower Jan-March

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_4

View scouting list →

Flight standings for WWT 3.5 Lower Jan-March have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Courtney Thomassen
usually #1 Female Singles 78%, also #1 Female Doubles 22% · published 4
3.42
Michele Heyn
usually #1 Female Doubles 58%, also #1 Female Singles 42% · published 3.5
3.06
Callum Tulloch
published 3.5
2.75
Allison Moorhead
published 3
2.74
Patricia de Simone
published
Louis Heyn
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michele Heyn + Courtney Thomassen404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Courtney Thomassen
65W–45L career · 9 lines in 2022
8%92%1%
3.69
3.5
Michele Heyn
109W–104L career · 19 lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
3.42
3.5
Callum Tulloch
15W–6L career · no lines in 2022
33%67%<1%
3.06
3
Allison Moorhead
12W–5L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
Patricia de Simone
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
2.74
Louis Heyn
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.