Teams

Longa (Salvadore Park)

2023 Miami-Dade Combo 18 & Over - Day · 6.5 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.25 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-08-22vs Terrazas (Morgan Levy Park)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesNatalia Emiliani C / Rina Saborio vs MONICA DONATO / Isabelle Wawa0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMina Schultes / Yanik Labrador vs Mildred Houdayer / Pilar Gomez5-7, 2-6
2023-07-19vs Miami-Dade/TeamRiviera/18&over6.5WLost 02
L#1 DoublesYanik Labrador / Beatriz Morales vs Kristin Anderson / Emily Burrows0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAna Gutierrez / Rina Saborio vs Daniella Reynolds / Yuliet Pellegrini0-6, 3-6
2023-07-12vs Terrazas (Morgan Levy Park)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesYanik Labrador / Beatriz Morales vs Tania Gaibor / Orit Mimoun3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJenifer Longa / Myrna Leal vs Suzel Araguez / Mildred Houdayer3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesRina Saborio / Carole Bernstein vs Pilar Gomez / Isabelle Wawa3-6, 2-6
2023-06-28vs Miami-Dade/TeamRiviera/18&over6.5WLost 02
L#1 DoublesJenifer Longa / Myrna Leal vs Kristin Anderson / Deanna Etzold4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesNatalia Emiliani C / Elvira Ernst vs Paola Campanella / ANGELA MUSSO2-6, 1-6
2023-06-27vs Terrazas (Morgan Levy Park)Won 10
W#3 DoublesJenifer Longa / Mina Schultes vs Yoandra Perez / Bibiana Botero4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-06-07vs Miami-Dade/TeamRiviera/18&over6.5WLost 02
L#1 DoublesSilvana Caamano / Belkys Ortiz vs Leticia Diaz / Deanna Etzold3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRina Saborio / Beatriz Morales vs Bertha Lowell / Paola Campanella6-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.87 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Belkys Ortiz
published 3.5
3.20
Silvana Caamano
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.18
Jenifer Longa
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.15
Ana Gutierrez
published 3.5
3.09
Natalia Emiliani C
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.08
Beatriz Morales
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.92
2.87
Myrna Leal
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.83
Yanik Labrador
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.76
Maria Llopiz
published
2.76
Carole Bernstein
published 3
2.69
Janet Sanchez
published
2.68
Mina Schultes
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.64
Rina Saborio
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.30
Kathy Swank
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Myrna Leal + Jenifer Longa51144% games+4.3% vs expected
Ana Gutierrez + Yanik Labrador01032% games−3.2% vs expected
Mina Schultes + Yanik Labrador191251% gamesnot enough data
Beatriz Morales + Yanik Labrador4745% gamesnot enough data
Myrna Leal + Yanik Labrador5547% gamesnot enough data
Beatriz Morales + Myrna Leal2541% gamesnot enough data
Mina Schultes + Jenifer Longa5256% gamesnot enough data
Beatriz Morales + Silvana Caamano0530% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Belkys Ortiz
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Silvana Caamano
80W–136L career · 4 lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Jenifer Longa
142W–163L career · 3 lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Ana Gutierrez
0W–9L career · type A · no lines in 2023
12%88%<1%
3.15
3
Natalia Emiliani C
99W–102L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%24%76%
3.09
3.5
Beatriz Morales
93W–111L career · 3 lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
3.08
Mariagrazia Salvador
5W–8L career · no lines in 2023
73%27%<1%
2.92
Myrna Leal
54W–115L career · 2 lines in 2023
84%16%<1%
2.87
3
Yanik Labrador
159W–173L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%89%10%
2.83
Maria Llopiz
1W–9L career · no lines in 2023
97%3%<1%
2.76
3
Carole Bernstein
26W–21L career · no lines in 2023
2%95%3%
2.76
Janet Sanchez
15W–25L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Mina Schultes
101W–88L career · 2 lines in 2023
8%91%1%
2.68
3
Rina Saborio
58W–76L career · 4 lines in 2023
15%85%<1%
2.64
Kathy Swank
0W–9L career · no lines in 2023
94%6%<1%
2.30

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.