Teams

SS-H GREEN

2024 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 9.0 - 55 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 4.38 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-06-12vs CP BLUELost 12
L#1 DoublesMargaret Lamb / Megan Abeyta vs Michelle Miller / Susan Hoelscher7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKara Gerczynski / Kristi Savignano vs Nora Harrison / Mary Ann Hilt1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesCrissy Wright / Michelle Arend vs Janet McNutt / Monica Haller7-5, 6-3
2024-06-05vs SS-LT GREENWon 20
W#2 DoublesJordan Campbell / Midi Daddis vs Jenny Phelps / Jacquelyn Deyoung-Boyle6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKristi Savignano / Kara Gerczynski vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-05-29vs SS-H YELLOWWon 21
L#1 DoublesMargaret Lamb / Megan Abeyta vs Deoni Levy / Amy Hand6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCrissy Wright / Michelle Arend vs Cindy McLemore / Victoria Barstow6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesJulie Clapham / Kristi Savignano vs Marcy MacDonnell / Lisa Damico Anderson2-6, 7-5, 1-0
2024-05-22vs GAC REDSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMegan Abeyta / Margaret Lamb vs Leslie Mease / Michelle McDonough6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesJulie Clapham / Midi Daddis vs Pam Turner / Katie Deline5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2024-05-15vs MC NAVYWon 20
W#1 DoublesCrissy Wright / Michelle Arend vs Claire Ehrlich / Heidi Dery6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMidi Daddis / Megan Abeyta vs Cyndy Besselievre / Lora Quirk6-2, 6-4
2024-05-08vs CP BLUESplit 11
W#2 DoublesKara Gerczynski / Kristi Savignano vs Anja Mapstone / Nora Harrison5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCrissy Wright / Michelle Arend vs Janet McNutt / Monica Haller6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2024-05-01vs SS-LT GREENWon 30
W#1 DoublesMegan Abeyta / Margaret Lamb vs Lori Benson / Jill Geist6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMichelle Arend / Crissy Wright vs Jacquelyn Deyoung-Boyle / Peggy Seyfert7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMidi Daddis / Laura Montoya vs Kristen Padberg / Heather Reimann7-5, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 9.0 - 55 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.16 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.43
Kara Gerczynski
published
4.26
Midi Daddis
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.22
Jordan Campbell
published
4.21
Julie Clapham
published
4.19
Laura Montoya
published
4.18
Megan Abeyta
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.15
Margaret Lamb
published
4.11
Crissy Wright
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
3.73
Kristi Savignano
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
Michelle Arend
published
Nancy Shipp
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Montoya + Julie Clapham3356% games+1.4% vs expected
Michelle Arend + Crissy Wright044 matchesnot enough data
Julie Clapham + Crissy Wright213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kara Gerczynski
14W–6L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.43
4.5
Midi Daddis
56W–94L career · 4 lines in 2024
3%92%4%
4.26
Jordan Campbell
14W–9L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
4.22
Julie Clapham
44W–27L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
4.21
Laura Montoya
20W–14L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
4.19
4.5
Megan Abeyta
61W–68L career · 5 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
4.18
Margaret Lamb
17W–24L career · no lines in 2024
15%85%1%
4.15
4.5
Crissy Wright
50W–46L career · 5 lines in 2024
21%78%<1%
4.11
4
Kristi Savignano
43W–71L career · 4 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
Michelle Arend
2W–15L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Nancy Shipp
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.