Teams

BM BLUE

2023 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 2.93 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-07-17vs RHCC GREENLost 01
L#2 DoublesKimberly Sperry / Neha Sitole vs Jessica Tsuo / Jennifer Curtis-Jones1-6, 1-6
2023-07-03vs GR NAVYWon 21
W#1 DoublesAshley Miller / Adrienne Bivens vs Kelly Meilstrup / Leann Koontz6-2, 6-4
L#1 SinglesNeha Sitole vs Jacki Malone1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesDawn Cominsky / Brenda Sears vs Tracey Felicidade Jones / Jennifer Bracher6-3, 6-3
2023-06-26vs KC-CC NAVYLost 02
L#1 DoublesAdrienne Bivens / Kimberly Picchietti vs Allison Coquet / Cathy Welch3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKimberly Sperry / Dawn Cominsky vs Cheryl Amador / Christi Hursta3-6, 2-6
2023-06-25vs KC-CC GOLDLost 12
L#1 DoublesKimberly Sperry / Millie Knox vs Kaitlin Vellore / Telly Weddon3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesKimberly Picchietti / Neha Sitole vs Christine McElhinney / Heather Larson6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJane Carlson / Brenda Sears vs Sarah Carlson / Jenna Masiello4-6, 0-6
2023-06-20vs BCST REDWon 30
W#1 SinglesAdrienne Bivens vs Colleen Callahan6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKimberly Sperry / Diana Collins vs Maryann Barwick / Kimberly Lange4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJane Carlson / Brenda Sears vs Sharon Ehler / Tanya Harris6-3, 6-4
2023-06-19vs NJ REDWon 10
W#3 DoublesNeha Sitole / Debbie Krenz vs Mary Rose Wilder / Gail Berkery6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
Adrienne Bivens
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.28
Jennifer Moxon
published
2.93
Theresa Fry
published
2.89
Neha Sitole
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
Dawn Cominsky
published 3
2.63
Kimberly Picchietti
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.50
Kimberly Sperry
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.46
Diana Collins
published 2.5
2.22
Jane Carlson
published
2.10
Brenda Sears
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Jodie Thompson
published
Millie Knox
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jodie Thompson + Dawn Cominsky4352% games+0.8% vs expected
Kimberly Sperry + Kimberly Picchietti4649% games−2.4% vs expected
Kimberly Sperry + Brenda Sears2535% games−8.0% vs expected
Jane Carlson + Brenda Sears0723% games−11.0% vs expected
Neha Sitole + Adrienne Bivens6264% gamesnot enough data
Kimberly Sperry + Neha Sitole3442% gamesnot enough data
Neha Sitole + Kimberly Picchietti4347% gamesnot enough data
Kimberly Picchietti + Adrienne Bivens5157% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Adrienne Bivens
96W–50L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%83%16%
3.36
Jennifer Moxon
13W–12L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.28
Theresa Fry
16W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%69%31%
2.93
3
Neha Sitole
60W–55L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
2.89
3
Dawn Cominsky
6W–14L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Kimberly Picchietti
34W–40L career · 2 lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
2.63
3
Kimberly Sperry
23W–50L career · type A · 4 lines in 2023
49%51%<1%
2.50
2.5
Diana Collins
12W–15L career · no lines in 2023
0%62%38%
2.46
Jane Carlson
5W–19L career · no lines in 2023
98%2%<1%
2.22
2.5
Brenda Sears
18W–77L career · 3 lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.10
Jodie Thompson
7W–10L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Millie Knox
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.