Teams

Countryside Sola

2023 Pinellas Adult 18 & Over Winter · 3.0 W Saturday

11 players · average NTRP 3.08 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-03-11Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMonique Sola / Kimberly Ankney vs Ursula Groll / Dolores Halkitis6-7, 4-6
2023-03-04vs Pinellas/Terradista/18&Over3.0WLost 01
L#1 DoublesKimberly Ankney / Monique Sola vs Jennifer Gibson / Meg DeSomery3-6, 3-6
2023-02-25vs RCSP FaraciLost 01
L#2 DoublesKimberly Ankney / Monique Sola vs Joanna Johns / Biatta Malkiewicz6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2023-02-18vs ELW HueholtLost 01
L#2 DoublesKimberly Ankney / Monique Sola vs Frances Skinner / Christine Hueholt7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2023-01-28Lost 01
L#2 DoublesKimberly Ankney / Monique Sola vs Kathy McMahon / Karen Morris3-6, 2-6
2023-01-21vs Pinellas/Terradista/18&Over3.0WLost 01
L#2 DoublesMonique Sola / Kimberly Ankney vs Melissa Wirt / Chris Pruett1-6, 2-6
2023-01-07vs Countryside DunnLost 01
L#1 DoublesKimberly Ankney / Elizabeth Tafone vs Anne Marie Lennox / Marisol Cohen4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 W Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Callee Lepley
published 3.5
2.77
Dana Galbraith
published 3
2.75
Julie Kalter
published
2.73
Michele Weinstock
published
2.69
Diane Gordon
published 3
2.69
Betsy Rutkowski
published 3
2.67
Monique Sola
published
2.64
Michele Sullivan
published
2.64
Anne Goodman
published 3
2.57
Kimberly Ankney
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
Elizabeth Tafone
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Kalter + Anne Goodman4155% games+9.1% vs expected
Dana Galbraith + Betsy Rutkowski0633% gamesnot enough data
Michele Sullivan + Betsy Rutkowski123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Callee Lepley
34W–6L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.33
3
Dana Galbraith
2W–12L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
2.77
Julie Kalter
10W–6L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%4%
2.75
Michele Weinstock
4W–8L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Diane Gordon
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
2.69
3
Betsy Rutkowski
4W–16L career · no lines in 2023
9%89%1%
2.69
Monique Sola
5W–2L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
2.67
Michele Sullivan
7W–7L career · no lines in 2023
15%84%1%
2.64
3
Anne Goodman
9W–8L career · no lines in 2023
16%84%1%
2.64
3
Kimberly Ankney
76W–159L career · 7 lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
2.57
Elizabeth Tafone
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.