Teams

BTA-Morgan

2024 Mixed 40 & Over · 5.0

12 players · average NTRP 2.81 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-08-04vs NWW-MI-GoodeWon 10
W#1 DoublesLeeann Renninger / Beau Ste Marie vs Emily Vavrichek / Jeremy Knievel0-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-08-02vs BTA-Longhorns-HuangLost 02
L#1 DoublesAnuradha Nandagiri / Michael Eng vs Helen Wang / Yang Chen2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesIngrid Munck / Casey Morgan vs Asako Endo / Changsong Shen3-6, 5-2
2024-07-21vs ETC-BoxLost 12
L#1 DoublesLeeann Renninger / Beau Ste Marie vs Laura Borner / Mehrdad Mozafari0-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesToni Adams / John Hogan vs Sophia Cheng / Miroslav Spassov3-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesLore Morgan / Casey Morgan vs Cecilia Verastegui / Utsav Prabhu6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-07-20vs CP-Racket Makers-ChoiLost 02
L#1 DoublesJanet Milam / Tom Lash vs Kesav Kaliyaperumal / Kim Watkins5-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLisa Allison / Michael Eng vs Joleen Lester / Kit Merker7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2024-07-14vs MC-5.0 Purple-MarkWon 30
W#1 DoublesTena Hanson / John Hogan vs Mark Downey / YUN LIU6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLore Morgan / Casey Morgan vs Suresh Siricilla / Jenny Wilson6-0, 0-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesIngrid Munck / Eugene Besel vs Jeremy Turner / Mousumi Sanyal6-4, 6-1
2024-07-06vs AYTC-CederWon 20
W#1 DoublesTena Hanson / John Hogan vs Carrie Toppano / James Thompson7-5, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLisa Allison / Michael Eng vs Leslie Lowe / Rob Ward6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2024-06-29vs NWW-PL-WalkerLost 03
L#1 DoublesLeeann Renninger / Beau Ste Marie vs Thomas Nilsson / Anca Zaharia0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesToni Adams / Michael Eng vs Sameer Karnik / Qiong Wei1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesAnuradha Nandagiri / John Hogan vs Steve Walker / Wendy Walker5-7, 7-6, 0-1
2024-06-15vs NWW-BC-McCulloughLost 03
L#1 DoublesTom Lash / Tena Hanson vs Gary Fowler / Asha DSouza0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesCasey Morgan / Lore Morgan vs Jon McCullough / Gabby Klingman3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBeau Ste Marie / Janet Milam vs Tom Bender / Jennifer Strelow4-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · 5.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NWW-PL-Walker7119515167
2NWW-BC-McCullough6217717149
3NWW-MI-Goode6215923173
4ETC-Box5315919180
5BTA-Longhorns-Huang44141023175
6CP-Racket Makers-Choi35111329212
7BTA-Morgan2671737249
8MC-5.0 Purple-Mark2642041255
9AYTC-Ceder1761838237

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.48 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.91
Tena Hanson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.73
Anuradha Nandagiri
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.63
Toni Adams
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.57
Lore Morgan
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.38
Casey Morgan
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.33
Eugene Besel
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
2.33
Ingrid Munck
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Beau Ste Marie
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
1.94
Tom Lash
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Janet Milam
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
John Hogan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Michael Eng
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lore Morgan + Casey Morgan41138% games−15.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Tena Hanson
65W–27L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%73%26%
2.91
3
Anuradha Nandagiri
60W–30L career · 7 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Toni Adams
30W–34L career · 2 lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
2.63
3
Lore Morgan
26W–37L career · 3 lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
2.57
3
Casey Morgan
4W–16L career · type S · 4 lines in 2024
80%20%<1%
2.38
2.5
Eugene Besel
13W–39L career · 5 lines in 2024
0%88%12%
2.33
Ingrid Munck
13W–16L career · 2 lines in 2024
88%12%<1%
2.33
2.5
Beau Ste Marie
1W–3L career · type M · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
2.5
Tom Lash
44W–98L career · 2 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
1.94
Janet Milam
4W–18L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
John Hogan
11W–50L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Michael Eng
5W–28L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.