Teams

declined: Mason/IS/DAY2.5

2026 TUL ADULT 18 & Over Day League · 2.5 WOMEN-DAY

6 players · average NTRP 2.50 / OKLAHOMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-11-14vs Reinhardt/LF/DAY 2.5Lost 12
W#1 DoublesSarah Rydholm / Elizabeth Brown vs Kalyn Reinhardt / Jessica Gross6-2, 6-1
L#1 SinglesJo Flory vs Lauren Hardy0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBrittany Ozaras / Michelle Walker vs Grace Sensintaffar / Friendly Yang3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-10-31vs Garcia/2.5DAY/LFWon 30
W#1 DoublesSarah Rydholm / Elizabeth Brown vs Tressa Nunley / Angela Yelich6-2, 7-6
W#1 SinglesMacie Brubaker vs Kim Lauer6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJennifer Mason / Brittany Ozaras vs Cathy Hodgs / Elaina Osteen6-3, 7-5
2025-10-30vs declined: Wyatt/SH/DAY2.5Lost 12
L#1 DoublesSarah Rydholm / Elizabeth Brown vs Maggie Yar / Heather Conklin1-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesMacie Brubaker vs Megan McKinney6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesKara Cooper / Brittany Ozaras vs Hailey Woodard / Erica Curran0-6, 0-6
2025-10-03vs declined: Arnold/LF/DAY 2.5WWon 21
L#1 DoublesAmy Gebbia / Jennifer Mason vs Abby Gibson / Lindsey Jessogne0-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesJo Flory vs Amy Arnold6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesBrittany Ozaras / Michelle Walker vs Melissa Trumbo / Rachel Diacon6-4, 6-2
2025-09-26vs Red 2: Welch/TTC/DAY 2.5Won 20
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Brown / Sarah Rydholm vs Reagan Welch / Catie Herrin6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesMacie Brubaker vs Melissa Easterling6-1, 6-0
2025-09-19vs Red 1: Croll/LF/Day2.5Won 21
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Brown / Sarah Rydholm vs Keely Gobbo / Stephanie Harris1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMacie Brubaker vs Laura Barnes7-6, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKara Cooper / Brittany Ozaras vs Chelsy Wilson / Rachael Pearson3-6, 0-6
2025-09-12vs declined: Maguire/LF/2.5 DaySplit 11
W#1 SinglesMacie Brubaker vs Crystal Maguire6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJennifer Mason / Sarah Rydholm vs Katie Hoffman-Faulk / Crystal Franks1-6, 2-6
2025-09-05vs Horvath/LF/Day 2.5Won 10
W#1 SinglesMacie Brubaker vs Rosalind Keith6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings18 teams · 2.5 WOMEN-DAY
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1declined: Wyatt/SH/DAY2.5802137107
2Kirkpatrick 2.5/GR7017411114
3declined: Maguire/LF/2.5 Day7119511133
4Blue 2:Grimes/LF/2.5DAY5214716145
5Tulsa DAY: Labadie/GR/DAY2.55214716159
6declined: Mason/IS/DAY2.553141021187
7Voegeli/TU/Day2.543101126192
8declined: Arnold/LF/DAY 2.5W35101430213
9Red 1: Croll/LF/Day2.535101431209
10Garcia/2.5DAY/LF3591531217
11Red 2: Welch/TTC/DAY 2.53591532239
12Siddall/SH/2.5DAY25111024172
13Coker/LF/Day2.5W2591228219
14Gray/2.5 Day/LF2561533221
15Reinhardt/LF/DAY 2.52691532234
16Horvath/LF/Day 2.52671736234
17Manlandro/LF/DAY2.51631837234
18Peterson /LF/Day2.5W000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.26 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.63
Macie Brubaker
usually #1 Singles 78%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published
2.29
Jo Flory
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Amy Gebbia
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.23
Sarah Rydholm
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
1.89
Brittany Ozaras
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Jennifer Mason
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Macie Brubaker
31W–9L career · 9 lines in 2026
0%17%83%
2.63
Jo Flory
26W–28L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%94%6%
2.29
2.5
Amy Gebbia
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Sarah Rydholm
11W–6L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.23
2.5
Brittany Ozaras
5W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.89
Jennifer Mason
7W–11L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.