Teams

Englert/18s/3.5/SC

2025 Man · Cov Mixed 18 & Over

16 players · average NTRP 3.58 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-06-27Won 10
W#2 DoublesKimberly Prather / David Appe vs Abi Caswell / Trey Caswell7-6, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Cov Mixed 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Alex Billings
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.52
Dane Landry
usually #2 Doubles 42%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.37
David Appe
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.31
Carson Abrams
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 28% · published 3.5
Bart Crader
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.19
Caroline France
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 31% · published 3.5
Eric Gay
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
Erin Englert
usually #3 Doubles 42%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Franco Centanni
usually #2 Doubles 48%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
Jordan Spinosa
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
Kimberly Prather
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Melisa Keo
usually #3 Doubles 58%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Rachel Mauti
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published
Shane Story
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
Spencer Rossie
usually #3 Doubles 64%, also #2 Singles 18% · published
Taylor Singletary
usually #1 Doubles 82%, also #3 Doubles 9% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Franco Centanni + Dane Landry6070% gamesnot enough data
David Appe + Carson Abrams314 matchesnot enough data
David Appe + Rachel Mauti213 matchesnot enough data
Jordan Spinosa + Rachel Mauti303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Alex Billings
16W–2L career · 15 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Dane Landry
22W–2L career · 12 lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.52
3.5
David Appe
10W–7L career · 12 lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.37
3.5
Carson Abrams
23W–4L career · 18 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Bart Crader
8W–2L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Caroline France
15W–13L career · 16 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Eric Gay
5W–5L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
Erin Englert
26W–16L career · 24 lines in 2025
not enough data
Franco Centanni
21W–8L career · 21 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jordan Spinosa
15W–4L career · 9 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kimberly Prather
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Melisa Keo
19W–3L career · 12 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rachel Mauti
17W–5L career · 10 lines in 2025
not enough data
Shane Story
7W–0L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
Spencer Rossie
15W–2L career · 11 lines in 2025
not enough data
Taylor Singletary
13W–3L career · 11 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.