Teams

KMacrone (BCC)

2022 Combo Doubles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Combo 5.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 2.83 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-10-05vs VTolson/KPetras (Firethorne)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesKate MacRone / Suzanne Meeker vs Courtney Slavin / Sheri Noot2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2022-09-28vs KDay/AHeath (OPRC)Split 11
L#1 DoublesStephanie Leichtweis / Kate MacRone vs Stacey Young / Mary Skibinski3-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesMelodie Ohaus / Natalie Corrigan vs LORRAINE TOMLIN / Lauren Packman6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesRachel Couchenour / Melodie Ohaus vs Angela Majewski / Karen Davies2-6, 3-6
2022-09-14vs VTolson/KPetras (Firethorne)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMelodie Ohaus / Kate MacRone vs Courtney Slavin / Caroline Lattanzi2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMelodie Ohaus / Natalie Corrigan vs Lisa Gregoire / Lynette McDonough6-0, 6-2
2022-08-24vs VTolson/KPetras (Firethorne)Split 11
W#1 DoublesKate MacRone / Rachel Miller vs Saima Barkat / Viki Tolson6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMelodie Ohaus / Natalie Corrigan vs Michelle Travis / Caroline Lattanzi3-6, 3-6
2022-08-17vs KDay/AHeath (OPRC)Won 10
W#1 DoublesKate MacRone / Rachel Miller vs Anna T Heath / Nannette Markham6-4, 6-2
2022-08-10Lost 01
L#2 DoublesKate MacRone / Suzanne Meeker vs Julie Stover / Kattiuska Mogelefsky3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Combo 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.57 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.90
Melodie Ohaus
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.80
Kate MacRone
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.51
Natalie Corrigan
published
2.48
Vonda Huss
published
2.38
Linda Shelton
published
2.35
Suzanne Meeker
published
Golin Kosowitz
published 2.5
Carrie Baker
published
Rachel Couchenour
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Suzanne Meeker + Carrie Baker033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Melodie Ohaus
98W–142L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
2.90
3
Kate MacRone
77W–124L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
2.80
Natalie Corrigan
8W–18L career · no lines in 2022
46%54%<1%
2.51
Vonda Huss
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
56%44%<1%
2.48
Linda Shelton
3W–8L career · no lines in 2022
83%17%<1%
2.38
Suzanne Meeker
1W–12L career · no lines in 2022
88%12%<1%
2.35
2.5
Golin Kosowitz
6W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Carrie Baker
0W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Rachel Couchenour
1W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.