Teams

SCC - Frischer/Avendano

2024 · 2025 SATA USTA MXD 40 & Over - Fall

17 players · average NTRP 3.57 / GEORGIA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 2025 SATA USTA MXD 40 & Over - Fall have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Anne Brooks
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.50
Caroline Gregory
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.47
Francisco VAldez
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.43
Adam Greer
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.39
Juan Avendano
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.39
Aimee Bellmore
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.37
Chad Brooks
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.33
Aida Avendano
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.31
Rich Greco
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.25
Cheshire Whitledge
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.22
Molly McCallion
published
3.18
Holly Whitfield
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.18
Todd Swezey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.04
Marc Frischer
usually #1 Doubles 25%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.98
Indie Harris
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Patti Fussell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Ridley Stallings
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Aida Avendano + Cheshire Whitledge7361% games+12.1% vs expected
Juan Avendano + Francisco VAldez14954% games−1.6% vs expected
Aimee Bellmore + Holly Whitfield5449% games−3.3% vs expected
Rich Greco + Marc Frischer224 matchesnot enough data
Aida Avendano + Francisco VAldez213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Anne Brooks
46W–27L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
3.5
Caroline Gregory
20W–17L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.50
Francisco VAldez
42W–36L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
3.47
3.5
Adam Greer
11W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.43
Juan Avendano
17W–13L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.39
3.5
Aimee Bellmore
13W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.39
3.5
Chad Brooks
14W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.37
3.5
Aida Avendano
20W–9L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Rich Greco
9W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Cheshire Whitledge
16W–9L career · type S · 3 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
Molly McCallion
10W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%5%95%
3.22
Holly Whitfield
9W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Todd Swezey
13W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Marc Frischer
16W–25L career · 4 lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
3.04
Indie Harris
21W–24L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
2.98
Patti Fussell
2W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ridley Stallings
10W–6L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.