Teams

Yadkin/Smith/55+3.5

2025 Yadkin Valley Adult 55 & Over · 3.5 Women Tuesday Day

8 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-04-29vs Yadkin/Haggard/55+3.5Lost 01
L#2 DoublesThuy Smith / Lois Clohessy vs Margret Padgett / Julia Barnes3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-04-15vs Yadkin/Haggard/55+3.5Split 11
L#2 DoublesEva Owens / Karen Wilson vs Julia Barnes / Linda Lowman6-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesThuy Smith / Cristina Fernandes vs Kimberly Salata / Gloria Gamble7-5, 6-3
2025-04-13vs Yadkin/Haggard/55+3.5Lost 01
L#2 DoublesEva Owens / Karen Wilson vs Patty Craig / Kelly Pryzwansky2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-04-01vs Yadkin/Haggard/55+3.5Lost 01
L#3 DoublesMitzi Cartrette / Thuy Smith vs Julia Barnes / Kimberly Salata5-7, 5-7
2025-03-25vs Yadkin/Haggard/55+3.5Lost 01
L#2 DoublesEva Owens / Karen Wilson vs Julia Barnes / Amy Dulin1-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-03-23vs Yadkin/Haggard/55+3.5Won 10
W#2 DoublesBonnie Colhoun / Thuy Smith vs Gloria Gamble / Margret Padgett6-7, 6-1, 1-0
2025-03-11vs Yadkin/Haggard/55+3.5Lost 02
L#2 DoublesLois Clohessy / Thuy Smith vs Patty Craig / Brandi Jacques0-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesMitzi Cartrette / Eva Owens vs Kimberly Gay / Kimberly Salata0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women Tuesday Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Cristina Fernandes
published 3.5
3.22
Laura Gregory
published
3.18
Susan Bjerke
published
3.14
Bonnie Colhoun
published 3.5
3.11
Lois Clohessy
published
3.00
Thuy Smith
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.87
Eva Owens
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.83
Mitzi Cartrette
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cristina Fernandes + Susan Bjerke2549% games+1.8% vs expected
Cristina Fernandes + Laura Gregory1442% games−14.3% vs expected
Eva Owens + Thuy Smith134 matchesnot enough data
Susan Bjerke + Laura Gregory134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cristina Fernandes
7W–33L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
Laura Gregory
23W–26L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.22
Susan Bjerke
9W–18L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Bonnie Colhoun
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
14%86%<1%
3.14
Lois Clohessy
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%19%81%
3.11
Thuy Smith
78W–86L career · 5 lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
3.00
3
Eva Owens
24W–33L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
2.87
Mitzi Cartrette
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
91%9%<1%
2.83

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.