Teams

Eubanks

2025 Lubbock Adult League 18 & Over · 2.5 Ladies

6 players · average NTRP / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-05-06vs ToddWon 30
W#1 DoublesKathy Eubanks / Jayme Pearson vs Kaci Griffin / Brittany Todd7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesYooneui Kim vs Jessica Gray6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesPaige Homen / Katie Kamper vs Sydney Farris / Jera Gentry6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-04-29vs ToddWon 30
W#1 DoublesKathy Eubanks / Jayme Pearson vs Natalie Butler / Erin Hornaday6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesKatie Kamper vs Sarah Bevers6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMackenzie Kirkpatrick / Kristina Edwards vs Jera Gentry / Sarah Durham6-4, 6-4
2025-04-22vs ToddLost 12
L#1 DoublesKathy Eubanks / Paige Homen vs Kaci Griffin / Erin Hornaday3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesJayme Pearson vs Sydney Farris3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesYooneui Kim / Kristina Edwards vs Jera Gentry / Brittany Todd6-2, 6-1
2025-04-15vs ToddWon 20
W#1 DoublesKatie Kamper / Paige Homen vs Sarah Bevers / Sydney Farris6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesYooneui Kim / Mackenzie Kirkpatrick vs Brittany Todd / Shannon Yarbrough6-0, 6-3
2025-04-08vs ToddWon 30
W#1 DoublesKathy Eubanks / Jayme Pearson vs Brittany Todd / Sarah Durham6-0, 6-0
W#1 SinglesPaige Homen vs Shannon Yarbrough4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMackenzie Kirkpatrick / Yooneui Kim vs Natalie Butler / Jessica Gray6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Ladies have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.63 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.80
Kathy Eubanks
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.71
Katie Kamper
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.63
Jayme Pearson
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.40
Paige Homen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Mackenzie Kirkpatrick
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Yooneui Kim
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jayme Pearson + Kathy Eubanks6262% games+19.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kathy Eubanks
17W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
2.80
Katie Kamper
13W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.71
Jayme Pearson
15W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
2.63
Paige Homen
10W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%77%23%
2.40
Mackenzie Kirkpatrick
5W–0L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Yooneui Kim
4W–0L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.