Teams

LEBTC BLUE

2024 USTA MIXED 18 & OVER - DEN · MIXED 7.0 - 18 & OVER

8 players · average NTRP 3.38 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-05-19vs PH NAVYSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJessica Field / Andy Field vs Elizabeth Steucek / John Nyvold6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesSusan Goldman / David Kannikal vs Arlene Cole / Nick Politano5-7, 2-6
2024-05-12vs PH BLUELost 02
L#1 DoublesDavid Kannikal / Susan Goldman vs Charles Bellows / Kristin Overton0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJessica Field / Andy Field vs Ericka Beck / Matt Overton6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2024-05-05vs KC-CC ORANGESplit 11
L#1 DoublesAndy Field / Jessica Field vs Malcolm Walker / Christi Hursta6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSusan Goldman / David Kannikal vs Holly Sharpeta / Ken Sharpeta6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-04-28vs SS-LGT BLUESplit 11
W#1 DoublesJessica Field / Andy Field vs Aiyman Samy / Amee Auberry6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesSusan Goldman / David Kannikal vs Lynne Monnar / Michael Giovannini5-7, 2-6
2024-04-07vs NJ GOLDLost 01
L#3 DoublesSusan Goldman / David Kannikal vs WC Ackerman / Kris Hansen2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 7.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Andy Field
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.29
David Kannikal
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.24
Cami Schaefer
published 3.5
3.22
Robert Stack
published
2.96
Jessica Field
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.77
Jamie Dreyer
published
Emily Dreyer
published
John Schaefer
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jessica Field + Andy Field17760% games+9.3% vs expected
Emily Dreyer + Jamie Dreyer14852% gamesnot enough data
Cami Schaefer + John Schaefer4151% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Andy Field
105W–50L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%52%48%
3.49
3.5
David Kannikal
109W–108L career · 8 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Cami Schaefer
14W–12L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.24
Robert Stack
15W–7L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
3
Jessica Field
106W–58L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%61%39%
2.96
Jamie Dreyer
29W–24L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
2.77
Emily Dreyer
19W–13L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
John Schaefer
7W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.