Teams

USTA Atlanta/Kyle Moyer

USTA Atlanta Fall - Mixed 18 & Over · 3.0 Mixed

13 players · average NTRP 3.07 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-10-17vs Polo Golf & CC (Jodi Ford)*Won 21
L#1 DoublesJamie Dennis / Adam van Horn vs Jodi Ford / Tim Troncoso3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesAmber Baldino / Raj Nadimpalli vs Heather Mcnaull / Tommy Mcnaull6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKyle Moyer / Kimberly Moyer vs Lianne Cornell / Ben Bleiman6-4, 7-6
2025-10-10vs Vickery (Katie Miller)*Won 30
W#1 DoublesKimberly Moyer / Adam van Horn vs Mattie Santowski / Michael Santowski6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAnja Giles / Josh Hanson vs Kyle Auffray / Nakita Auffray6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKyle Moyer / Amber Baldino vs Chelsie Gruber / Nathan Gruber6-0, 6-0
2025-10-03vs Wild Timber (Keri McCorvey)*Won 21
W#1 DoublesJamie Dennis / Raj Nadimpalli vs Jamie Bak / Ovidiu Nicoara6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCraig Giles / Anja Giles vs Emerald Wick / David Wick2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesEddie McDonald / Charity van Horn vs Matthew Brotherton / Lindsay Davis3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#1 DoublesJamie Dennis / Adam van Horn vs Patricia McFadden / Jason McFadden7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRaj Nadimpalli / Anja Giles vs Eddie Quinones / Jessica Quinones6-1, 7-6
W#3 DoublesOTTO MUTZBERG II / Charity van Horn vs Marie King / Jason King6-0, 6-0
2025-09-19vs Cambridge (Michael Woody)*Won 21
L#1 DoublesAdam van Horn / Charity van Horn vs Chirag Mistry / Amisha Mewada1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJamie Dennis / Josh Hanson vs Mohamad Yassine / Hala Yassine6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesCraig Giles / Anja Giles vs Veronica Bell / Rick Matarrese6-1, 6-1
2025-09-12vs Polo Golf & CC (Jodi Ford)*Lost 12
L#1 DoublesKimberly Moyer / Adam van Horn vs Katelyn Reitz / Tim Troncoso4-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesRaj Nadimpalli / Amber Baldino vs Chris Davis / Tiffany Davis6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesEddie McDonald / Anja Giles vs Ansley Hall / Nicholas Hall3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings15 teams · 3.0 Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1USTA Atlanta/Rebecca Hooks601449121
2Morningview (Yeol Huh)*5114411121
3Lansdowne (Yifei Wang)*5114411132
4USTA Atlanta/Kyle Moyer5113512129
5Bitsy Grant (Nyles Peterson)*5113514123
6TPC Sugarloaf (Taeho Park)*5110818150
7Polo Golf & CC (Jodi Ford)*4211714130
8Bitsy Grant (Sabrina Schatzman)*3311718161
9Sweetwater (Anne Fernando)*3310819148
10Bitsy Grant (Kendall Taylor)*339920146
11ITP Training Academy (Zeldrick Martin)*3381023160
12EE Robinson (Jongyeob Shin)*2471124171
13Wildwood Springs (Stephen West)*2481026194
14Chimney Springs (Emily Simmons)*2461227182
15Briscoe Park (Anthony Evans)*1551329198

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Jamie Dennis
published 3.5
3.00
Anja Giles
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.93
Charity van Horn
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.91
Amber Baldino
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.89
Adam van Horn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.86
Eddie McDonald
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.81
Shradha Yadav
published
2.76
Kimberly Moyer
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.69
Craig Giles
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Josh Hanson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kyle Moyer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
OTTO MUTZBERG II
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Raj Nadimpalli
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Charity van Horn + Adam van Horn5257% gamesnot enough data
Craig Giles + Anja Giles4259% gamesnot enough data
Charity van Horn + OTTO MUTZBERG II4167% gamesnot enough data
Kyle Moyer + Amber Baldino314 matchesnot enough data
Kimberly Moyer + Adam van Horn224 matchesnot enough data
Eddie McDonald + Anja Giles123 matchesnot enough data
Adam van Horn + Jamie Dennis303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jamie Dennis
16W–5L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Anja Giles
20W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
3.00
3
Charity van Horn
33W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Amber Baldino
48W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
2.91
3
Adam van Horn
16W–19L career · type A · 5 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
2.89
3
Eddie McDonald
7W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%86%14%
2.86
Shradha Yadav
4W–1L career · no lines in 2026
1%92%7%
2.81
Kimberly Moyer
35W–31L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%95%3%
2.76
3
Craig Giles
10W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%92%1%
2.69
Josh Hanson
9W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kyle Moyer
10W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
OTTO MUTZBERG II
10W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Raj Nadimpalli
9W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.