Teams

Cesareo (DAY)

2026 South East Tennis Combo League 55 & over · Women 6.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.20 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-08-31vs Kontoulas DAYWon 21
L#1 DoublesKathleen Murphy / Amy Dunn vs Ann Schuelke / Susan Stahl4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMia Delmontagne / Joan Lynch vs Laura Kogler / Andrea Zoller6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesKim Cesareo / Caroline Quinn-Alger vs Bett Lewis / Cheryl Holland7-6, 6-3
2026-08-26vs Stephanski/Hollett-MottWon 30
W#1 DoublesSinead Dunne / Ange Urlaub vs Kimberly Bassano / Karen Galey6-0, 7-5
W#2 DoublesDiana Kollevoll / Joya Cottington vs Donalda Cairney / Eleni Pappamihiel6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCaroline Quinn-Alger / Cynthia Spitzer vs Tracy Stephanski / Catherine Gill6-2, 6-4
2026-08-25vs Pelton/Daly DAYLost 12
L#1 DoublesAmy Dunn / Kathleen Murphy vs Lisa Daly / Susan Wilson1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMia Delmontagne / Joan Lynch vs Rachael Bondy / Dawn McKenna2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesKim Cesareo / Ange Urlaub vs Katie Monroe / Gail Conklin3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-08-12vs Kear/LepariWon 30
W#1 DoublesCynthia Spitzer / Liz Sullins vs Kathleen Kear / Sandra Babyak6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesSinead Dunne / Catherine Regan vs Rebecca Perdue / Pamela Boswell6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDiana Kollevoll / Marlynne Marlow vs Brenda DiMeglio / Robyn Schneider6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings13 teams · Women 6.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Fenton/Richard D2051332
2Pelton/Daly DAY2042546
3Cesareo (DAY)1030013
4Graeser 2026 55+ 6.5 Combo1021327
5Weeks (Day) Fall 2026 Combo1133754
6MacCall000000
7Stephanski/Hollett-Mott000000
8Sample 55-6.5000000
9Ferner Combo0112430
10Lemmons (Day)0112530
11Doss 55+ Combo0112531
12Kear/Lepari0103636
13Kontoulas DAY02151065

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Sinead Dunne
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Cynthia Spitzer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.23
Diana Kollevoll
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.11
Jennifer Ashford
published
3.02
Mia Delmontagne
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.98
Kathleen Murphy
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
2.98
Marlynne Marlow
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.91
Liz Sullins
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.87
Caroline Quinn-Alger
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.87
Ange Urlaub
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.80
Joan Lynch
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.78
Catherine Regan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.67
Joya Cottington
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kim Cesareo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Diana Kollevoll + Joya Cottington404 matchesnot enough data
Mia Delmontagne + Jennifer Ashford123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sinead Dunne
8W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Cynthia Spitzer
6W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Diana Kollevoll
6W–4L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
Jennifer Ashford
8W–13L career · no lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.11
Mia Delmontagne
7W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
3.02
Kathleen Murphy
14W–25L career · 6 lines in 2026
56%44%<1%
2.98
Marlynne Marlow
4W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%56%44%
2.98
Liz Sullins
13W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%75%25%
2.91
3
Caroline Quinn-Alger
16W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%84%16%
2.87
3
Ange Urlaub
128W–106L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%84%16%
2.87
Joan Lynch
15W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Catherine Regan
4W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
2%94%5%
2.78
Joya Cottington
15W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
10%90%1%
2.67
Kim Cesareo
7W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.