Teams

JHutson (Carmel)

2022 Adult 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Adult 2.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.12 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2022-05-09vs KDouglas/SLang (Firethorne)Split 11
W#1 SinglesErrin Jensen vs Alisa Longo6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAnne McCurry / Meghan Walters vs Jenny Harper / Karisa Douglas2-6, 4-6
2022-05-02vs MMcArdle (Weddington Chase)Won 20
W#1 DoublesQuinn Goff / Errin Jensen vs Jenn Jones / Lutfiye Ugurlu6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMeghan Walters / Virginia Ferguson vs Tracy Alexander / Julie Martin6-3, 6-4
2022-04-25vs AWagner/KHoracek (Life Time)Won 10
W#2 DoublesKristin Thompson / Errin Jensen vs Kris Horacek / Ashley Whitley6-0, 6-2
2022-04-18vs SKwon (Carmel)Won 10
W#2 DoublesQuinn Goff / Errin Jensen vs Robyn Hayward / Stephanie Kwon1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-04-04vs JGentile (The Club at Longview)Won 10
W#2 DoublesMeghan Walters / Kelly Kaiser vs Jessica Kuperman / Alisa Hood7-5, 6-0
2022-03-28vs LBrandt/TMacuga (Park Crossing)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesErrin Jensen / Kristie Halstead vs Molly Brown / Sarah Garner4-6, 4-6
2022-03-21vs MMetzl/KJohnson (Sardis)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKristin Thompson / Meghan Walters vs Kate Johnson / Tracy Thomas3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-03-07vs ETindel (Charlotte Country Club)Won 20
W#1 DoublesMary Kate Kearney / Meghan Walters vs Emily Tindel / Andrea Harknett6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesErrin Jensen vs Nancy Lowry6-0, 6-1
2022-02-28vs JSwanson (Springfield)Won 10
W#1 DoublesCatherine Bauer / Errin Jensen vs Julie Swanson / Gretchen Orr6-3, 6-4
2022-02-21Won 10
W#1 SinglesErrin Jensen vs Maria Gritsay6-0, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Catherine Bauer
published 3.5
3.22
Errin Jensen
usually #1 Singles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.05
Stefania Faraj
published
3.00
Kelly Kaiser
published
2.99
Meghan Walters
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.54
Quinn Goff
published
2.33
Tiffany Ashmore
published
2.16
Anne McCurry
published 2.5
2.01
Mary Kate Kearney
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Catherine Bauer
35W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%39%61%
3.54
3.5
Errin Jensen
40W–19L career · 8 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.22
Stefania Faraj
16W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%36%64%
3.05
Kelly Kaiser
6W–3L career · no lines in 2022
51%49%<1%
3.00
3
Meghan Walters
45W–24L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%53%47%
2.99
Quinn Goff
5W–9L career · no lines in 2022
36%64%<1%
2.54
Tiffany Ashmore
7W–10L career · no lines in 2022
0%91%9%
2.33
2.5
Anne McCurry
10W–18L career · no lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
2.16
Mary Kate Kearney
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
2.01

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.