Teams

Naples Grande - L. Lavery

2022 Collier Adult 40 & Over Fall · Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Women

6 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-12-07Won 20
W#1 SinglesCarol Polipnick vs Maryann Kriger6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesShannon Carroll / Cristina Arango vs Cheryl Toth / Erika Klein6-2, 6-0
2021-11-30vs Marco YMCA - J. HeiseWon 20
W#1 SinglesCarol Polipnick vs Jennifer Bonfitto6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJill Frank / Cristina Arango vs Andrea Washak / Jacqueline Heise6-4, 6-2
2021-11-16vs Marco YMCA - J. HeiseWon 21
W#1 DoublesDebra Logue / Heidi Stock vs Karen Huffman / Stephanie Opel6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesCarol Polipnick vs Tricia McBride3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCristina Arango / Lorrie Lavery vs Mary Milchanowski / Stacy Faremouth2-6, 5-7
2021-11-09Won 10
W#1 SinglesCarol Polipnick vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-11-02vs Olde Cypress - NavarroWon 20
W#1 DoublesCristina Arango / Heidi Stock vs Tina Albright / Erika Klein6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesDebra Logue vs Michelle Maggal7-6, 6-1
2021-10-26vs Fall Winners - Grey OaksLost 02
L#1 SinglesDebra Logue vs Londa Nau6-7, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLori Murphy / Cristina Arango vs MacKenzie Rickman / Anne Marie Russell4-6, 4-6
2021-10-20vs Olde Cypress - PacanaWon 10
W#2 DoublesDebra Logue / Cristina Arango vs Ann Biever / Vesna Petrovic3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-10-19vs Pelican Marsh - BargerSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDebra Logue / Pamela Clark vs Sunny Barger / Marie Shoaf3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesLorrie Lavery / Cristina Arango vs Mara Mazza / Debra Bowenkamp7-5, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Debra Logue
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 4
3.81
Sara Munholland
published
3.79
Carol Polipnick
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
Barbara Dovin
published 4
Cristina Arango
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.32
Lorrie Lavery
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Debra Logue
162W–90L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
3.90
Sara Munholland
9W–5L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Carol Polipnick
240W–112L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.79
4
Barbara Dovin
7W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Cristina Arango
58W–34L career · type A · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
Lorrie Lavery
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.