Teams

Sargent/Nashville

2025 Adult 18 & Over - Nashville · 4.5 Men - Sunday 3:30

13 players · average NTRP 4.50 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-05-04vs Ternes/Bates/NashvilleLost 04
L#1 DoublesMadison Mummert / Brandon Mordecai vs Charles Hawkins / Shane Hutton2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesCharles McCray vs Charlie Sevier3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesBrian Schaaf / Robert Grimes vs Christopher Bates / Benton Drake2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesMark Sargent vs Sam Wasko1-6, 1-6
2025-04-27vs Ternes/Bates/NashvilleLost 05
L#1 DoublesMadison Mummert / Ali Murad vs Mateus Fairbairn / Charles Hawkins4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMichael McKeown vs Christopher Bates6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJames Fong / Brandon Mordecai vs Bradley Ternes / Charlie Sevier1-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesDoug Story vs Javier Saez4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesRobert Grimes / Mark Sargent vs Erick Hale / Jacob Parrish3-6, 1-6
2025-03-30vs Ternes/Bates/NashvilleLost 23
L#1 DoublesRobert Grimes / Doug Story vs Javier Saez / Charles Hawkins6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMark Sargent vs Bradley Ternes2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAli Murad / Igor Shalkevich vs Christopher Bates / Benton Drake3-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesMichael McKeown vs Lanny Martin7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJames Fong / Brian Schaaf vs Jacob Parrish / Tyler Strong3-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Men - Sunday 3:30 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.13 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.31
Charles McCray
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.29
Ryan Hitt
published
4.28
Doug Story
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Ali Murad
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
Brandon Mordecai
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
Brannon Jones
published 4.5
Brian Schaaf
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.14
James Fong
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
4.12
Michael McKeown
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
4.04
Igor Shalkevich
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
4.04
Robert Grimes
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.84
Mark Sargent
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Madison Mummert
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael McKeown + Mark Sargent2343% games+7.5% vs expected
Robert Grimes + Doug Story134 matchesnot enough data
Michael McKeown + Igor Shalkevich224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Charles McCray
5W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%9%
4.31
Ryan Hitt
12W–6L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
4.29
Doug Story
10W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%5%
4.28
4.5
Ali Murad
1W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Brandon Mordecai
0W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Brannon Jones
7W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Brian Schaaf
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
James Fong
3W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
15%84%1%
4.14
Michael McKeown
15W–27L career · 2 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
4.12
Igor Shalkevich
27W–9L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%38%62%
4.04
Robert Grimes
2W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
4.04
Mark Sargent
7W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
88%12%<1%
3.84
Madison Mummert
1W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.