Teams

Robertson-ICC

2024 Adult 18 & Over-DLT · Men 3.5

8 players · average NTRP 3.25 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-05-11vs Radicioni-CCCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJared Busick / David Landwirth vs Trent Jennings / Jacob Millwood4-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesDustin Simmons vs Judd Williams6-3, 6-3
2024-05-11vs Radicioni-CCCWon 21
W#1 DoublesJohn Robertson / Dustin Simmons vs Wesley Radicioni / Trent Jennings6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJared Busick vs Jacob Millwood6-4, 6-1
L#2 SinglesDavid Landwirth vs Judd Williams3-6, 2-6
2024-05-06vs Knight-TravelLost 03
L#1 DoublesJohn Robertson / Dustin Simmons vs W Dave Carpenter / Michael Murphy4-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesBrian Andrus vs Jeremy Foster3-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesJared Busick vs Jeffery Suber4-6, 4-6
2024-04-18vs Knight-TravelLost 02
L#1 DoublesJared Busick / Dustin Simmons vs Kenneth Wells / Jeremy Foster5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesBrian Andrus / David Landwirth vs Mark Hunter / Michael Murphy3-6, 4-6
2024-04-04vs Radicioni-CCCWon 21
W#1 DoublesJohn Robertson / David Landwirth vs Wesley Radicioni / Jacob Millwood6-4, 6-1
L#1 SinglesDustin Simmons vs Judd Williams5-7, 4-6
W#2 SinglesMorgan McDowell vs Trent Jennings6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-04-03vs Knight-TravelLost 04
L#1 DoublesWill Mcdowell / Dustin Simmons vs Robert Curry / Nicolas Quintana Ashwell6-7, 3-6
L#1 SinglesWill Eifling vs Jeremy Foster2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJared Busick / Alex Howarth vs CHRIS BOYKIN / W Dave Carpenter1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDavid Landwirth / William Smith vs Mark Hunter / Michael Murphy1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Men 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Knight-Travel5125511153
2Radicioni-CCC2492146327
3Robertson-ICC2452552338

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Alex Howarth
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Dustin Simmons
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 3.5
2.80
David Landwirth
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
Brian Andrus
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
Jared Busick
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
Morgan McDowell
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Will Eifling
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Will Mcdowell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Alex Howarth
11W–15L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Dustin Simmons
7W–11L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
3
David Landwirth
3W–13L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Brian Andrus
8W–8L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Jared Busick
3W–12L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Morgan McDowell
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Will Eifling
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Will Mcdowell
3W–8L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.