← Teams

WHRC-Charlton

2020 Adult 18 & Over · 2.5 Women

2 players · average NTRP 3 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.96
Heather Dale
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
—
Carrie Anderson
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 0
Results7 ties
2020-03-07Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesClair Charlton / Heather Dale vs Kirsten Sessions / Andrea Cedfeldt7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2020-03-01Lost 0–1
L#1 SinglesHeather Dale vs Catherine Huang6-1, 6-2
2020-02-16Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesTonya Mahler / Carrie Anderson vs Natalie Mesnier / Nancy Yen Shipley6-2, 6-3
2020-02-08Lost 0–2
L#1 SinglesHeather Dale vs Carole Bell6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesAlison Money / Carrie Anderson vs Leslie Pihl / Jeanne Eyman6-0, 6-2
2020-02-01Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesHeather Dale / Tonya Mahler vs Jennifer Gwin / Anne Johnson6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMelanie Doud / Carrie Anderson vs Noelle Hamilton / Rachel Andrechak6-0, 6-1
2020-01-26Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesClair Charlton / Heather Dale vs Kristine Lehmann / Jennifer Clark7-6, 6-3
2020-01-05Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesCarrie Anderson / Heather Davidson vs Jody Yates / Amy Mai6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesHeather Dale vs Yayun Tung6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3
Heather Dale
94W–94L career
0%89%11%
2.96
0
Carrie Anderson
0W–14L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.