Teams

ALACHUA/Molyneux

2022 Alachua Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women

10 players · average NTRP 4.30 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-13vs Jonesville - FullerWon 10
W#1 DoublesNancy Embree / Kelly Banes vs Samantha Walton / Alison Andrus6-3, 6-0
2022-07-09vs Jonesville - FullerSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMEGAN MOLYNEUX / Nancy Embree vs Alison Andrus / Samantha Walton6-0, 7-6
L#2 DoublesRachel Rodriguez / Kelly Banes vs Lan Hoang-Minh / Kristina Ford2-6, 2-6
2022-06-18vs Jonesville - FullerWon 20
W#2 DoublesAubrey Hall / Nancy Embree vs Kristina Ford / Taiana Mendez6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesTammy Miller / Tara Edelstein vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-06-12vs Jonesville - FullerWon 10
W#3 DoublesTara Edelstein / Tammy Miller vs Mary Cribb / Lan Hoang-Minh7-5, 7-5
2022-06-11vs Jonesville - FullerWon 20
W#1 DoublesNancy Embree / MEGAN MOLYNEUX vs Mary Cribb / Carolyn Shinn6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKelly Banes / Rachel Rodriguez vs Amanda Fuller / Allison Shinn6-1, 6-2
2022-06-04vs Jonesville - FullerWon 10
W#1 DoublesNancy Embree / Kelly Banes vs Mary Cribb / Carolyn Shinn6-2, 6-4
2022-05-21vs Jonesville - FullerWon 10
W#2 DoublesNancy Embree / Dawn Dean vs Ali Messenger / Kiara Fuentes6-2, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.88 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.37
Kelly Banes
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.35
Emily Dace
published 4.5
4.24
Anne Billion
published 4.5
3.96
Wheeler Crawford
published
3.82
Jordan Davis
published
3.77
Tammy Miller
published
3.68
Tara Edelstein
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 17% · published
3.66
Dawn Dean
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.57
Nancy Embree
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.41
Heather Gibson
published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Embree + Dawn Dean6156% gamesnot enough data
Kelly Banes + Nancy Embree314 matchesnot enough data
Kelly Banes + Emily Dace314 matchesnot enough data
Tammy Miller + Heather Gibson314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Kelly Banes
136W–60L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
4.37
4.5
Emily Dace
3W–1L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%12%
4.35
4.5
Anne Billion
110W–84L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
4.24
Wheeler Crawford
9W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%63%37%
3.96
Jordan Davis
6W–3L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.82
Tammy Miller
4W–7L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
Tara Edelstein
88W–67L career · 6 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Dawn Dean
44W–50L career · 1 line in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.66
Nancy Embree
63W–33L career · 6 lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
3.57
4
Heather Gibson
6W–4L career · no lines in 2022
75%25%<1%
3.41

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.