Teams

UPTA18C/Rice/Cardinal

2025 UPTA Combo 18 & Over - SC · 18 Combo Men - 8.5

12 players · average NTRP 4.20 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-09-13vs USTA18C/Reardon/Sportsclub - ACACWon 21
L#1 DoublesBrian Laufenberg / Rowland Burns vs Frank Powell / Benjamin McFarland1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesTodd Pruette / Robert Spencer vs Grant Hunter / Joshua Childs6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKody Alcantar / Christopher Collins vs Richard Babcock / Latif Alam6-4, 6-0
2025-08-30vs UPTA18C/Keel/Holly TreeLost 12
L#1 DoublesBrian Laufenberg / Kody Alcantar vs Toby Rawlings / Jimmy ten Pas3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesPatrick RICE / Benn Harmon vs Brett Brading / Brian Bartlett6-7, 0-6
W#3 DoublesRobert Spencer / Drew Welborn vs Raj Pandya / Jay Swetenburg6-1, 6-2
2025-08-23vs UPTA18C/Gray/KrocLost 02
L#1 DoublesPatrick RICE / Rowland Burns vs Jackson Dozier / Harry Reed3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKody Alcantar / Clark Anderson vs Hunter Gray / Patrick Dayton2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 Combo Men - 8.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.12
Brian Laufenberg
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.82
Todd Pruette
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.58
Christopher Collins
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.57
Robert Spencer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.53
David Chudyk
published 4
3.47
Benn Harmon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.41
Clark Anderson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.40
Patrick Rice
published
3.32
Rowland Burns
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
Kody Alcantar
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Drew Welborn
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Patrick RICE
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patrick Rice + Rowland Burns6455% games+16.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Brian Laufenberg
3W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
4.12
Todd Pruette
8W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
91%9%<1%
3.82
4.5
Christopher Collins
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
3.58
Robert Spencer
9W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%31%69%
3.57
4
David Chudyk
0W–8L career · no lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
3.53
4
Benn Harmon
1W–10L career · type T · 1 line in 2025
59%41%<1%
3.47
4
Clark Anderson
9W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
73%27%<1%
3.41
Patrick Rice
10W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.40
Rowland Burns
14W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%89%9%
3.32
Kody Alcantar
2W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%92%4%
3.26
Drew Welborn
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Patrick RICE
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.