Teams

Yadkin/Norman - 4.0/3.5/3.0

2025 Yadkin Valley Tri-Level 18&Over · Men 4.0-3.5-3.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.42 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-07-12vs Yadkin/Burkhalther - 4.0/3.5/3.0Won 10
W#3 DoublesDavid Fuerst / Jeff Clay vs David Crews / Manas Mishra9-7
2025-07-12vs Yadkin/Burkhalther - 4.0/3.5/3.0Won 10
W#3 DoublesJeff Clay / David Fuerst vs Tory Wagoner / Manas Mishra8-5
2025-07-12vs Yadkin/Burkhalther - 4.0/3.5/3.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesMason Norman / Mark Yamane vs Max Sandberg / Jorge Estrada2-8
W#2 DoublesScott Buchanan / Aravindh Raj Sankara Narayanan vs Daniel Johnson / Dean Burkhalter8-4
L#3 DoublesBlake Suess / Chris Sigley vs Tory Wagoner / Manas Mishra1-8
2025-07-12vs Yadkin/Burkhalther - 4.0/3.5/3.0Won 21
W#1 DoublesJosh Ivester / Mark Yamane vs Alex George / Joe Peele8-3
L#2 DoublesAravindh Raj Sankara Narayanan / James Richards vs Daniel Johnson / Alex Djuro8-9
W#3 DoublesBlake Suess / Chris Sigley vs David Crews / Tory Wagoner8-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 4.0-3.5-3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.15
Mark Yamane
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.01
Mason Norman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.93
Scott Buchanan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.73
Andrew Hjelt
published 4
3.69
Aravindh Raj Sankara Narayanan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.61
James Richards
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.56
Josh Ivester
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.39
Jeff Clay
published
3.34
Chris Sigley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.95
Blake Suess
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.69
David Fuerst
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Aravindh Raj Sankara Narayanan + Jeff Clay303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mark Yamane
17W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%12%88%
4.15
Mason Norman
22W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
47%53%<1%
4.01
Scott Buchanan
62W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.93
4
Andrew Hjelt
24W–27L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.73
3.5
Aravindh Raj Sankara Narayanan
90W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%8%92%
3.69
3.5
James Richards
20W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%19%81%
3.61
Josh Ivester
25W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.56
Jeff Clay
37W–20L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.39
3.5
Chris Sigley
56W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
3.34
3
Blake Suess
23W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
David Fuerst
46W–76L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
2.69

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.