Teams

FK - MacMurray

2021 Marion Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Adult Women 40 & Over

11 players · average NTRP 3.83 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-05-21vs Marion - FK/WattsLost 01
L#3 DoublesAmy Gibboney / Hollie Powell vs Lisa Degirolami / Nicole Wigelsworth1-6, 0-6
2021-05-17vs Marion - FK/WattsLost 02
L#2 DoublesLinda Brown / Valerie Elvin vs Lisa Degirolami / Yasmine Okonkwo5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesLori Croy / Andrea Harden vs Jennifer Hewitson / Lisa Steed1-6, 3-6
2021-05-16vs SKY - GarrickSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLori Croy / Valerie Elvin vs Susan Garrick / Pamelia Payne0-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesHollie Powell / Peggy Ray vs Linda Lademann / Irma Buttermore1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2021-04-26vs Marion - FK/WattsLost 02
L#1 DoublesLori Croy / Valerie Elvin vs Jennifer Boyd / Debby Watts2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesHollie Powell vs Diana Royo2-6, 0-6
2021-04-17vs SKY - GarrickWon 10
W#1 DoublesLori Croy / Andrea Harden vs Susan Garrick / Anna Olejnik-Mirra6-3, 6-4
2021-04-02vs Marion - FK/WattsLost 01
L#1 SinglesHollie Powell vs Diana Royo2-6, 4-6
2021-03-28vs SKY - GarrickLost 01
L#1 DoublesPamela Plumlee / Hollie Powell vs Marti Little / Susan Garrick6-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult Women 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Andrea Harden
published 4
3.54
Lori Croy
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.53
Valerie Elvin
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.50
Karen Fellabaum
published
3.48
Dina Sapienza
published 4
3.31
Hollie Powell
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.27
Wendy MacMurray
published
Linda Brown
published
Nancy Little
published
Pamela Plumlee
published
Tamara Gorski
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Valerie Elvin + Lori Croy5252% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Andrea Harden
1W–4L career · no lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.69
Lori Croy
75W–42L career · 4 lines in 2021
38%62%<1%
3.54
Valerie Elvin
125W–108L career · 3 lines in 2021
40%60%<1%
3.53
Karen Fellabaum
1W–2L career · no lines in 2021
49%51%<1%
3.50
4
Dina Sapienza
8W–7L career · no lines in 2021
56%44%<1%
3.48
3.5
Hollie Powell
26W–70L career · 5 lines in 2021
1%92%7%
3.31
Wendy MacMurray
5W–8L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.27
Linda Brown
4W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Nancy Little
2W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Pamela Plumlee
4W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Tamara Gorski
9W–8L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.