Teams

12 ACAC Tandett

2022 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.30 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-06-04vs 17 LPC EarleWon 10
W#1 DoublesBarbara Kasten / Mary Knick vs Kelly Termini / Carolyn Elgin6-0, 6-0
2022-06-03vs 16 SRA FoleyWon 10
W#1 DoublesBarbara Kasten / Mary Knick vs Toosdhi Jackson / Jill Wiggins6-0, 6-1
2022-05-28vs 22 Willow Oaks Knierim/ChenaultWon 10
W#1 DoublesBarbara Kasten / Jodi Tandett vs Catherine Matawaran / Anne Scher7-5, 6-0
2022-05-15vs 9 Raintree MassengillWon 10
W#1 DoublesMary Knick / Laleh Amin vs Molly Smith / Shannon Foster6-4, 6-1
2022-05-14vs 2 Woodlake PhelpsWon 20
W#1 DoublesBarbara Kasten / Jodi Tandett vs Jeanean Phelps / Irene Shepherd7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAndrea Cumbie / Mary Knick vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-04-23vs 1 Westwood GilmanWon 10
W#1 DoublesLaleh Amin / Mary Knick vs Renee Gilman / Carlyle Walek3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-04-16vs 19 Woodlake LarocheWon 10
W#2 DoublesBarbara Kasten / Jodi Tandett vs Virginia Patterson / Sandra Bavaro6-3, 7-6
2022-04-02vs 23 Three Chopt HennesseyWon 10
W#1 DoublesMary Knick / Diane Reale vs C Suzanne Finley / Michele Asher6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Lauren Bale
published
3.38
Allison Krumpe
published 3.5
3.36
Jodi Tandett
published
3.34
Mary Knick
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #1 Singles 31% · published 3.5
3.28
Lori Strobl
published
3.26
Stacy McLeod
published
3.25
Barbara Kasten
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.11
Jill Bunn
published
2.87
Jessica Cox
published
2.79
Abbe Voigt
published 3
2.62
Diane Reale
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Knick + Barbara Kasten303 matchesnot enough data
Jodi Tandett + Barbara Kasten123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lauren Bale
6W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%69%31%
3.43
3.5
Allison Krumpe
13W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
3.38
Jodi Tandett
18W–12L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%14%
3.36
3.5
Mary Knick
204W–130L career · 13 lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
3.34
Lori Strobl
28W–21L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.28
Stacy McLeod
15W–10L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Barbara Kasten
158W–66L career · 5 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
Jill Bunn
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.11
Jessica Cox
10W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%83%16%
2.87
3
Abbe Voigt
8W–6L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%5%
2.79
3
Diane Reale
9W–11L career · no lines in 2022
17%82%<1%
2.62

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.