Teams

Angus/Nashville

2026 Adult 18 & Over - Nashville · 3.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-04-27vs Hoover/NashvilleWon 41
L#1 DoublesJill Obremskey / Alison Grippo vs Kate Blankerts / Anna Miller6-7, 0-6
W#1 SinglesKelli Haywood vs Tiffany Chen6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJoy Harris / Lauren Carlson vs Jessica Prest / Abigail Hale6-4, 7-5
W#2 SinglesKatye Hughes vs Toni Kim6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLele Thompson / Monaliza Safarian vs Brittany Rae / Catherine Pham6-2, 6-2
2026-04-20vs Hamrick/NashvilleWon 31
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Coburn / Katye Hughes vs Rita Spellings / Margaret Emley6-1, 6-0
L#1 SinglesJoy Harris vs Quinn Cantwell4-6, 6-0, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLele Thompson / Monaliza Safarian vs Emily Eggebrecht / Meredith Gilbertson7-6, 6-0
W#3 DoublesAlison Grippo / Lauren Carlson vs Jenny Hamrick / Morgan Estep6-3, 6-0
2026-04-13vs Walker/NashvilleWon 30
W#1 DoublesKelli Haywood / Joy Harris vs Natalie Bisignano / Victoria Marcella6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKatye Hughes / Jill Obremskey vs Crayton Wells / Allison Varble6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLauren Carlson / Carey Burch vs Rachel Walker / Leslie Klurfeld6-4, 6-3
2026-03-23vs Maroon/NashvilleWon 32
L#1 DoublesLele Thompson / Alison Grippo vs Christine Maroon / Mary Morgan Holley1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesJoy Harris vs Samantha Bryan4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSarah Angus / Elizabeth Coburn vs Hailey Pierson / Nicole Gresham7-6, 6-2
W#2 SinglesKelli Haywood vs Amy Beno6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKatye Hughes / Jill Talbert vs Cristin Webb / Heidi Kemp7-5, 7-5
2026-03-23vs Hoover/NashvilleWon 41
W#1 DoublesSarah Angus / Kelli Haywood vs samantha o'neil / Brittany Rae6-4, 7-5
L#1 SinglesLele Thompson vs Grace van Winkle3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesAlison Grippo / Jill Obremskey vs Abigail Hale / Kate Blankerts6-3, 7-6
W#2 SinglesKatye Hughes vs Leah Riek6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLauren Carlson / Joy Harris vs Carey Hoover / Anna Miller6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2026-03-09vs Stemmler/Appiah-opoku/NashvilleSplit 22
W#1 DoublesJill Talbert / Elizabeth Coburn vs Elizabeth Derck / Katy Miller6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesLele Thompson vs Charlotte Dolan4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJoy Harris / Alison Grippo vs Carol Fujiyoshi / Lisa Rota4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLauren Carlson / Jill Obremskey vs Alex Barron / Tess Huggins2-6, 7-6, 0-1
2026-03-02vs Hamrick/NashvilleWon 31
L#1 DoublesCarey Burch / Jill Obremskey vs Meredith Gilbertson / Quinn Cantwell1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesLauren Carlson / Lele Thompson vs Michelle Nealy / Katie Claiborne6-1, 6-3
W#2 SinglesKelli Haywood vs Jenny Hamrick6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJill Talbert / Elizabeth Coburn vs Rita Spellings / Margaret Emley3-6, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.77 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.11
Kelli Haywood
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published
2.89
Elizabeth Coburn
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.83
Lauren Carlson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.81
Jill Talbert
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.81
Katye Hughes
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.76
Joy Harris
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.68
Jill Obremskey
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.66
Lele Thompson
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.58
Alison Grippo
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.55
Carey Burch
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
Monaliza Safarian
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carey Burch + Lele Thompson123 matchesnot enough data
Katye Hughes + Jill Talbert303 matchesnot enough data
Kelli Haywood + Elizabeth Coburn303 matchesnot enough data
Jill Talbert + Elizabeth Coburn303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kelli Haywood
26W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%20%80%
3.11
3
Elizabeth Coburn
18W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
2.89
Lauren Carlson
13W–10L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.83
Jill Talbert
13W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%92%8%
2.81
Katye Hughes
12W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
2.81
Joy Harris
6W–15L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
2.76
Jill Obremskey
6W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
2.68
Lele Thompson
15W–24L career · 8 lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
2.66
3
Alison Grippo
2W–6L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
28%72%<1%
2.58
3
Carey Burch
7W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
35%65%<1%
2.55
Monaliza Safarian
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.