Teams

CDTA S 18&OW3.0 2.Wilm Cohen Sun 3 $20

1Summer 18&O WN · WE

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
W#1 DoublesGinny Lazarus / Jessica Coffin vs Johanna Heppeler / Becky Liston6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesLaurie Woolverton vs Julianne Hartzell4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBrooke Laufer / Lori Guba vs June Chang / Andee Harris6-4, 6-2
W#2 SinglesCHRISTINE TAN vs Anne Feder6-2, 6-4
W#1 DoublesAmanda Ripp / Leena Bhat vs Valerie Harris / Lisa Betts5-7, 3-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesLaurie Woolverton vs Jessica Hutchins6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesELIZABETH BULF vs Natalie Neiman6-2, 6-0
W#1 DoublesGinny Lazarus / ELIZABETH BULF vs Ally Alston / Sandra Holl6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLeena Bhat / Amanda Ripp vs Holly Krois / Mandy Tandy6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesLaurie Woolverton vs Carla Cisneros5-7, 6-5
W#3 DoublesBrooke Laufer / Allison Cohen vs Shanna Palmersheim / Molly Klein Catalano6-3, 6-3
W#1 DoublesELIZABETH BULF / Ginny Lazarus vs Karen Kos / Jody Sternberg6-1, 6-5
W#1 SinglesMonika Thadhani vs Aimee Hombach6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJessica Coffin / Amanda Ripp vs Lauren Budz / Sarah Leonard7-6, 6-1
L#2 SinglesLaurie Woolverton vs Kristina Kallianis3-6, 3-4
W#3 DoublesBrooke Laufer / CHRISTINE TAN vs Lisa Goldfayn / Betsy Sanders6-2, 6-2
W#1 DoublesELIZABETH BULF / Jessica Coffin vs Samantha Garrity / Juli Theo6-3, 6-1
L#1 SinglesMonika Thadhani vs Nicole Koleno1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLeena Bhat / Beth Horowitz Steel vs Julie Bell / Laura Breakstone0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLaurie Woolverton / Alison Manhoff vs Jamie Rauscher / Margaret Keane6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 DoublesGinny Lazarus / ELIZABETH BULF vs Lisa Charpentier / Julie Budzynski6-0, 7-6
L#1 SinglesMonika Thadhani vs Courtney Robson1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesLeena Bhat / Amanda Ripp vs Katherine Stone / Natalie Kroft6-3, 6-0
L#3 DoublesLori Guba / Brooke Laufer vs Jenny Duda / Chris Henderson3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · WE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA S 18&OW3.0 5.Wilm Brown Mon 7 $205123717203
2CDTA S 18&OW3.0 2.Wilm Cohen Sun 3 $2042201024219
3CDTA S 18&OW3.0 6.MTB Cohen Sun 2 $2942171329238
4CDTA S 18&OW3.0 4.RCLB Sherman Sun 4 $2242151533257
5CDTA S 18&OW3.0 1.XS Charles Sun 3 $2724121838264
6CDTA S 18&OW3.0 3.MTC Brown Sun 2 $33.515102042292
7CDTA S 18&OW3.0 7.Tam Krois Sat 11 $221582243294
8zDROPPED CDTA S 18&OW3.0 8.MTP Ray Sat 2 $27000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.95
Ginny Lazarus
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
2.92
ELIZABETH BULF
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
2.88
Brooke Laufer
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.88
2.84
Jessica Coffin
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.84
Amanda Ripp
published 3
2.79
Beth Horowitz Steel
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3
2.72
Leena Bhat
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.65
Monika Thadhani
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.57
Lori Guba
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.56
Laurie Woolverton
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
2.55
CHRISTINE TAN
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Beth Horowitz Steel + Amanda Ripp4364% games+13.8% vs expected
Leena Bhat + Amanda Ripp23956% games+7.6% vs expected
Ginny Lazarus + ELIZABETH BULF221853% games+4.0% vs expected
Leena Bhat + Laurie Woolverton3447% games+1.8% vs expected
Amanda Ripp + ELIZABETH BULF3943% games+1.7% vs expected
Leena Bhat + Beth Horowitz Steel2344% games−4.7% vs expected
Ginny Lazarus + Amanda Ripp4545% gamesnot enough data
CHRISTINE TAN + Laurie Woolverton2437% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ginny Lazarus
73W–98L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
2.95
ELIZABETH BULF
41W–40L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
2.92
3
Brooke Laufer
10W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
2.88
3
Michelle Nacheman
77W–96L career · no lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
2.88
Jessica Coffin
23W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
2.84
3
Amanda Ripp
51W–54L career · no lines in 2026
1%86%13%
2.84
3
Beth Horowitz Steel
18W–20L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.79
Leena Bhat
42W–62L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.72
Monika Thadhani
45W–69L career · 3 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
2.65
Lori Guba
12W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
2.57
Laurie Woolverton
15W–30L career · 5 lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
2.56
3
CHRISTINE TAN
36W–81L career · 2 lines in 2026
37%63%<1%
2.55

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.